Lyx/ReLyx bugs
Hi - Lyx developers
first of all - thanks heaps for your great program. I'm
a very enthusiastic Lyx user, and I use it for many
projects - as well as always recommending it to all my
colleagues and students.
However, often prospective users find the `trivial'
problems they encoun
Hello all,
I've reimplemented FormCredits for the GNOME frontend using our current
libglade method. In addition I had to alter gnome_helpers and add some
casts as gcc 2.96 was choking on some of the font related functions.
It's a complete rewrite, I preferred the Gnome::About look and feel bu
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Hmmm. I was thinking of a simple implementation that allows, in the TOC pop-up,
> four operations (= arrow buttons):
> ^. Move this header up,
> v. move this header down,
> <. promote,
> >. demote.
> ^ and v would move the current section/subsect
On 30 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On 29 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | > "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | I have verified that POTFILES.in is not necessary in the CVS. Someone
> | > | can go ahead and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> If you are raising the issue of:
> bxform-088-glibc.tgz vs. bxform-088-glibc2.1.tgz,
> unfortunately the error is the same with each.
>
> bxform-089 for glibc and glibc2.1 are the same here.
>
> Redhat 7.0 is a glibc2.1 based box.
I was not raising any issue. I use
If you are raising the issue of:
bxform-088-glibc.tgz vs. bxform-088-glibc2.1.tgz,
unfortunately the error is the same with each.
bxform-089 for glibc and glibc2.1 are the same here.
Redhat 7.0 is a glibc2.1 based box.
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:04:24PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> [EMAIL PRO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It seems strange that a fresh compile of the latest xforms
> sources I could find yields the error Jurgen spoke of here,
> related to method `int stringbuf::sync ()'.
>
> Rather than try and track down some Redhat 6.x rpm, can someone
> point me to bxforms sources th
It seems strange that a fresh compile of the latest xforms
sources I could find yields the error Jurgen spoke of here,
related to method `int stringbuf::sync ()'.
Rather than try and track down some Redhat 6.x rpm, can someone
point me to bxforms sources that will compile correctly on
Redhat 7.0?
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 12:00:45PM +0100, Kalle Dalheimer wrote:
> From: Kalle Dalheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB
> To: Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Outlining
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:00:45 +0100
> X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
> In-Re
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 12:35:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
...
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Outlining
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
> Organization: LyX Developer http://www.lyx.org/
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0
Kalle Dalheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| If there is interest in this, I can try to retrofit that code into the
| current LyX, but this would require changes to the LyX kernel, so I would
| need some help there. Also, the GUI will be difficult to implement for any
| frontend that does not
On Sunday 01 April 2001 12:37, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the article here
>
> http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-03-30-004-20-SC
>
> mentions (k)LyX, but goes on to explain that the author couldn't
> adopt it because of the lacking outline feature.
>
> Emacs has it. How hard would it be
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| It could be of the nature of "move a section/subsection/etc up/down,
| with all the stuff 'under' it, relative to neighbouring sections
| on the same level". Buttons for this could be in the TOC pop-up.
This has been on the list for some time. Now aft
Hi,
the article here
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-03-30-004-20-SC
mentions (k)LyX, but goes on to explain that the author couldn't
adopt it because of the lacking outline feature.
Emacs has it. How hard would it be to add this to LyX?
It could be of the nature of "move a
14 matches
Mail list logo
