Re: I'm not anymore able to compile lyx

[Garst R. Reese]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> If you are raising the issue of:
> bxform-088-glibc.tgz vs. bxform-088-glibc2.1.tgz,
> unfortunately the error is the same with each.
> 
> bxform-089 for glibc and glibc2.1 are the same here.
> 
> Redhat 7.0 is a glibc2.1 based box.
I was not raising any issue. I use bxform-089-glib2.1 and also used 88
with no problems, but I don't do Redhat.
Garst