Subject:
CONFIRMATION cash received
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2000 22:20:22 -0100
From:
"Pat Dahlberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED
"R. Lahaye" wrote:
> File->New // Collapse New and New_from_template.
> // Use "invalid" filename; when saved, call 'Save as...' automatically.
> // Should a window popup ask for Template/Class or assume a default for
>that?
> Open // Collapse Open and Import. Open accor
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| What is your recommendation regarding LyX RPMs? Should I generated
| them --with-included-string? That's my inclination, considering the
| 800K bloat.
Just use --with-included-string ... unless you want to create gtk
rpm's :-)
Lgb
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 12:22:14AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I have reduced LyX' requirements on std::string so that we are now
> able to compile with the std::string distributed with egcs and gcc
> 2.95.x. LyX will use this by default. If you want to use the lyxstring
> you have to u
I have reduced LyX' requirements on std::string so that we are now
able to compile with the std::string distributed with egcs and gcc
2.95.x. LyX will use this by default. If you want to use the lyxstring
you have to use --with-included-string. One "bad" thing about the
std::string in gcc is tha
Marko Vendelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| the attached patch together with additional files included into the
| .tar.gz archive adds elementary support for GTK/Gnome frontend: configure
| scripts, Gtk/Gnome initialization, Gnome event loop processing, and
| Copyright dialog box implementation.
"R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| "Open" opens an existing document! Isn't a class/template already
| defined inside an existing document? Why must it popup a "New from
| Template"?
Why must "Open" open an existing document?
| Open: Collapse "Open" and "Import". Open accord
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So you always use "New from template..." and newer "New..."? Well I
| for myself
| use a lot "article" textclass and do much more "New..." (without template)
| then "New from template", so I'm much faster with just a "New ..." menu where
| I don't have
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > File->New // Collapse New and New_from_template.
| > // Use "invalid" filename; when saved, call 'Save as...' automatically.
| > // Should a window popup ask for Template/Class or assume a default for
|that?
|
| NO, NO, NO!
|
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 10:30:12AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Amir Karger wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 02:45:29AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > >
> > > /my/dir/my_file.tex: import failed. (buffer-import latex: [M-fil])
> > >
> > > Is this a bug?
> >
> > Maybe.
>
> How can I more directly
I've just checked out your code Jean-Marc with
cvs update
I've just compiled the code without any problem. However, running it I get the
message
Menubar::Pimpl::set: menubackend is empty! using default values.
With or without a document loaded there are only 3 items in the menubar, File,
E
OK, I have finally commited my work from this week end. A few random notes:
- Toolbar and menubar are in frontends, with implementation in
frontends/xforms. The external interface is GUI-indep. There may be
a way to use signals between the interface and the private
implementation, but I do
On 24-Jul-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> It may be an update problem (the buttons are disabled when there is no
> buffer, except for new and open, but may not be re-enabled later). Do
> you have a custom toolbar?
Yes I have a custom toolbar! But the buttons are not enabled from the
beginn
On 24-Jul-2000 R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> Well, this is exactly my point, why I suggested to redesign the menu.
> Currently the menu has too many confusing options and overlaps:
>
Well this has nothing to do with the menu-structure and I think we should
leave this function as is.
>
> Along these l
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Well the problem is that the toolbar still displays right but
Juergen> I can press only the first button (to the left!), all others
Juergen> are ignored.
It may be an update problem (the buttons are disabled when there is no
b
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> >
> > I believe that "Open" should ONLY allow you to open an existing file,
> > whether that's lyx, latex, text, noweb or doc (extension sensitive!).
> > Don't make a "New from templates" also a hidden feature of "Open".
>
> Why not let it be as it is now? If we don't fi
On 24-Jul-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> No, but I might have changed the time where it is read... I have to
> admit that I did not test redefining the toolbar from configuration
> file. I will first commit the code I've been working on (still
> struggling with cxx) where I _did_ change th
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Hi! I just noticed that my toolbar does not work anymore!
Juergen> Could someone explain me what happend. I had a look at
Juergen> lyxrc.examples in the lib/ directory and it has still the
Juergen> same format I use for my .lyx
>
> I believe that "Open" should ONLY allow you to open an existing file,
> whether that's lyx, latex, text, noweb or doc (extension sensitive!).
> Don't make a "New from templates" also a hidden feature of "Open".
Why not let it be as it is now? If we don't find the file just ask the
User if he
Allan Rae wrote:
> >
> > Open: Collapse "Open" and "Import". Open according to file
> >extension: .lyx, .tex, .txt, .nw, .doc are opened as
> >you expect.
> >Does .txt input need a "as lines/as paragraph" popup?
>
>
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Allan Rae wrote:
> > This then leaves us with a new "Open..." that can create a new named
> > document (emacs style) and which should/must popup the new "New from
> > Template..." popup. (That is, the new "Open..." is really a slightly
> > better version o
When documenting the \set_color lyxrc command I forgot that strings in
lyxrc must be enclosed in quotes. I thus put in a misleading example.
The attached patch (again lyxdoc CVS) fixes this problem. I also
rearranged the table for the default colors.
Lior.
set_color_doc.gz
Allan Rae wrote:
> This then leaves us with a new "Open..." that can create a new named
> document (emacs style) and which should/must popup the new "New from
> Template..." popup. (That is, the new "Open..." is really a slightly
> better version of the old "New...")
"Open" opens an existing doc
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> So you always use "New from template..." and newer "New..."? Well I for myself
> use a lot "article" textclass and do much more "New..." (without template)
> then "New from template", so I'm much faster with just a "New ..." menu where
> I don't have to
Hi!
I just noticed that my toolbar does not work anymore! Could someone explain
me what happend. I had a look at lyxrc.examples in the lib/ directory and
it has still the same format I use for my .lyxrc-toolbar-defines.
Jean-Marc did you change the format?
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
>
>
> File->New // Collapse New and New_from_template.
> // Use "invalid" filename; when saved, call 'Save as...' automatically.
> // Should a window popup ask for Template/Class or assume a default for
>that?
NO, NO, NO!
IMO we need "New..." AND "New from template..."
On 22-Jul-2000 Lior Silberman wrote:
> In current CVS, with NEW_INSETS defined to 1 (but NEW_TABULAR undefined),
> I found the following:
>
> Method Buffer::writeFileAscii (buffer.C) has a variable called 'actcell'
> which is declared to be int* . Despite this, it is used in the following
> ways
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Remove them. As far as I know, they were never used.
Dekel> Wrong. The dvi_to_ps_command lyxrc variable is used when a
Dekel> Postscript file is created.
To put it differently: I guess most people do not chenge them and are
pleased with
On 24-Jul-2000 Allan Rae wrote:
>
> I'm confused by the above sentence (perhaps it should be 5 sentences).
> Are you saying you think we should keep the "New.." and "New from
> template.." menu entries that we currently have?
>
Was I that unclear!? I meant that I want to have a
New...
29 matches
Mail list logo
