Odd this. I have been emailing Mike both with the text and to say that my
site is www.paulwork.demon.co.uk
I think i may have a mail problem!
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'd like to drop a copy of version 0.0 of the new FAQ in CVS sometime soon
> (yes, I real
> does thes mean that putting lang german in the same place does not work?
I don't know since I did not try that. This 'solution' was the result of
creating a document with the same visible contents manually whereas the
first one (the broken one) stems from some diploma thesis.
Andre'
--
It'l
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It also contains changes needed to remove the old form_print from the
> sources
I didn't want that code removed until I/we had compared the two
implementations to ensure that any bug fixes etc had be included in the
backported work. However, this is o
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It also contains changes needed to remove the old
> form_print from the sources. This code will use the NEW
> print dialog.
>
> This dialog does not yet work properly.
> 1. The file name is appended to an incorrect path.
> 2. There are some unaligned e
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Look at the following .lyx file:
>
> snip
> #LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
> \lyxformat 2.16
> \textclass report
> \begin_preamble
> \usepackage{dina4konni}
> \usepackage{amsthm,bbm}
> \usep
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 12:03:41AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Look at the following .lyx file:
>
[A LyX file]
>
> This file is not exported correctly to LaTeX by current (CVS)LyX.
> There is a superflous closing brace *after* the dot.
> (I think it stems from paragraph.C line 2070).
>
>
Look at the following .lyx file:
snip
#LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 2.16
\textclass report
\begin_preamble
\usepackage{dina4konni}
\usepackage{amsthm,bbm}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{pifont}
%\usepac
Hello all,
I'd like to drop a copy of version 0.0 of the new FAQ in CVS sometime soon
(yes, I really am going to do this, though v0.0 will be little more than
an outline). I'd like to get my hands on a copy of the old FAQ first to
steal as much from it as I can, but I haven't been able to access
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 06:44:45PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> | On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> | >
> | >
> | > You should try the lyx version from cvs, I think some fixes to these
> |
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| egcs-1.1.2 on a DEC Alpha. Apparently (JMarc says) Alpha
| binaries are big anyway and egcs produces masses of bloat.
Not that much bloat, but Alpha is 64 bit and a close to doubling in
binary size is to be expected.
The gcc linker and compiler are ge
egcs-1.1.2 on a DEC Alpha. Apparently (JMarc says) Alpha
binaries are big anyway and egcs produces masses of bloat.
Angus
> | Actually, that was the head branch of CVS, compiled without
> | exceptions. Compiling the rae branch with exceptions gives
> | me a slightly SMALLER unstripped binary of
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Actually, that was the head branch of CVS, compiled without
| exceptions. Compiling the rae branch with exceptions gives
| me a slightly SMALLER unstripped binary of 28MB. Stripping
| it produces a slightly larger 3.1MB.
What compiler and os did you sa
Angus> Hi all, I've just noticed the size of the binary of lyx-cvs:
Angus> -rwxr-xr-x 1 aleem users 32768000 Mar 27 11:36 src/lyx*
Angus> That's 32MB!
JMarc> I get only:
JMarc> -rwxr--r-- 1 lasgoutt meval11968512 Mar 21 15:59 lyx
JMarc> But that's because I do not use the new-and-improved
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| >
| >
| > You should try the lyx version from cvs, I think some fixes to these
| > problems is in there.
| >
| > | // Dirty hack to get blue symbols quickly
| > |
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> You should try the lyx version from cvs, I think some fixes to these
> problems is in there.
>
> | // Dirty hack to get blue symbols quickly
> | - char * sx = strstr(data[2], "")
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> OK, in response to everyone's reassurances, consider my feathers
Amir> unruffled. I'm not averse to using a completely different
Amir> program in the long run; I just wanted to make sure people are
Amir> aware that there are no easy fi
OK, in response to everyone's reassurances, consider my feathers unruffled.
I'm not averse to using a completely different program in the long run; I
just wanted to make sure people are aware that there are no easy fixes, and
any attempt to write a new reLyX (rereLyX?) will take a lot of work and
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| No, I don't think so. We kind of stopped halfway.
I thought we did some of the std::pair fixes?
Lgb
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You should try the lyx
Lars> version from cvs, I think some fixes to these problems is in
Lars> there.
No, I don't think so. We kind of stopped halfway.
Lars> | // Dirty hack to get blue symbols quic
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Well I'm ready to submit some fixes I recently made. I let in the above
| fix so it is commited to cvs.
Good. Go ahead.
Lgb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You should try the lyx version from cvs, I think some fixes to these
problems is in there.
| CC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I../images
| -I/opt/TWWfsw/libxforms/include -I/opt/TWWfsw/xpm/include
| -I/usr/openwin/include -xO3 -c layout.C
| "layout.C", line 1217: Error
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 04:07:40PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Albert" == Albert Chin-A-Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Albert> Just tried compiling lyx 1.1.4fix2 on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC
> Albert> 5.0: CC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I../../images
> Albert> -I./..
On 29-Mar-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| #:O) you noticed this? That's the stuff I tell you all the time (and
>| I fixed it here) and you told me this was made by you intentionally
>| ;)
>
> I though you described the situation where:
>
> "g |
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| #:O) you noticed this? That's the stuff I tell you all the time (and
| I fixed it here) and you told me this was made by you intentionally
| ;)
I though you described the situation where:
"g | g"
and then do a char-forward
and got so
The attached patch was created with
cvs diff -p -u > angus.patch
bzip2 angus.patch
It contains the changes I needed to make to get the rae
branch to compile with egcs-1.1.2/GNU STL and lyxstring.
It also contains changes needed to remove the old
form_print from the sources. This
25 matches
Mail list logo
