Hi!!
I used Lubuntu without problems for a very long time, but now, with the last
update, I had a black screen and is impossible to go in system normally. I
tried with "nomodeset" and runs normally, but I don't like this "strage"
options to work with my pc...well, my machine is:
- AMD A6-5400
Den 2016-04-24 kl. 11:03, skrev Jordi Segués:
Hi!!
I used Lubuntu without problems for a very long time, but now, with the
last update, I had a black screen and is impossible to go in system
normally. I tried with "nomodeset" and runs normally, but I don't like
this "strage" options to work with
On 04/24/2016 04:03 AM, Jordi Segués wrote:
Hi!!
I used Lubuntu without problems for a very long time, but now, with
the last update, I had a black screen and is impossible to go in
system normally. I tried with "nomodeset" and runs normally, but I
don't like this "strage" options to work wi
Greetings,
I found out what the problem was and I have adjusted the wiki page.
The difference from the daily PPA and my PPA is that my PPA is *just* the
metapackage and the daily PPA has more than that.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Hi Simon,
in that case, would you revert the instructions back to using the lubuntu
ppa which is more recognisable than a single person's ppa
I followed
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw/LXQt#Installing_LXQt_on_fresh_system last
night (an earlier edition of the page) and it worked fine.
Regards.
P
Afaik Simon's PPA was the only one with the metapackage, so it's still
relevant while we wait to get it in all the other places.
On Apr 24, 2016 13:08, "Phill. Whiteside" wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> in that case, would you revert the instructions back to using the lubuntu
> ppa which is more recognisa
The Lubuntu PPA has the metapackage, but it has other packages that in my
experience have caused conflicts. The PPA is just a single, clean instance that
takes packages from Ubuntu.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ub
Do you know what steps, if any, have been taken to resolve this in the
daily PPA? If not, we should make that a priority to have fixed.
On Apr 24, 2016 13:17, "Simon Quigley" wrote:
> The Lubuntu PPA has the metapackage, but it has other packages that in my
> experience have caused conflicts. The
hi,
I do appreciate the keeness, but when faced with "it doesn't work" I ran
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw/LXQt#Installing_LXQt_on_fresh_system
and it worked. My reasoning is therefore that we should stick to a proven
working system that will, after all, be what Julien pushes forward for
adoptio
Yeah the problem from the OP is the daily PPA. Simon's causes no such
problems. Thus, while you're thinking is not wrong, it's not relevant. If
anything, we should warn people not to use the daily PPA.
On Apr 24, 2016 1:22 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" wrote:
hi,
I do appreciate the keeness, but when
I'll leave it, as you do not understand what I'm saying... the lubuntu ppa
will be the one used by julien... So, we should be using that one for
testers.
But?... meh :D
Phill.
On 24 April 2016 at 21:27, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> Yeah the problem from the OP is the daily PPA. Simon's caus
On 04/24/16 15:19, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> Do you know what steps, if any, have been taken to resolve this in the
> daily PPA? If not, we should make that a priority to have fixed.
I honestly do not know. There are earlier versions, later versions, and in the
end, having a massive amount of pa
Thank you Simon,
I do not have system to upgrade anymore so I won't have a chance to
test. But If I find some time I'll try to do a fresh install in a VM.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I found out what the problem was and I have adjusted the wiki pag
I guess I missed a lot of the conversation when I replied earlier.
I was not aware of the process. I really though you were working of
Julien's Meta.
I know a lot of people(testers) have been using Julien's Meta for a
while and therefore when something breaks or is out of place it is
fixed very
Greetings,
This was a simple issue on my part, that was easily solved. His PPA has a lot
more things to worry about. Also, my package is relatively stable. If you wish
to grab the source and take a look for yourself, go right ahead.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
-
Good point here. PPAs are, in general, to be considered unstable and
unsupported (read: risky). This is true with both of the PPAs we're
discussing.
Often times daily build PPAs track upstream changes which may create
problems. Because of this, they should not be recommended.
The reason using the
I've modified the wiki page[1] to state:
"At this time, we are waiting for the LXQt metapackage to be included in the
Ubuntu repositories. For now, use the ppa:tsimonq2/lxqt-meta PPA for an
up-to-date metapackage. The purpose of this PPA is to simplify installing the
packages required for LXQt.
Perhaps it would be good to explain that this metapackage does in one step
what the directions proceeding do?
On Apr 24, 2016 21:48, "Simon Quigley" wrote:
> I've modified the wiki page[1] to state:
>
> "At this time, we are waiting for the LXQt metapackage to be included in
> the Ubuntu reposito
Well that is what the instructions are doing. Are you implying saying
basically, "tl;dr install the package and you are good"?
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.u
19 matches
Mail list logo
