Doesn't sound like it could be used. The idea would be to have actual
app-managed widgets with an interface to the file manager for integration
(grid style etc).
J. Leclanche
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:27 PM, PCMan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Jerome Leclanche
> wrote:
> > Really aw
On 4 July 2013 10:47, PCMan wrote:
> Will razor-qt source tree be separated into different modules in the
> future?
>
I agree that's needed. I can't say whether it will actually be done, as I
don't commit a lot myself, but for the sake of cooperation I do believe we
should make it possible to co
Really awesome.
And holy hell, the screenshot looks like it could have been Razor-qt.
I'm really glad we have an actively developped file manager and image
viewer in Qt as those were two apps that were seriously missing.
What is the desktop+file widget on the screenshot? Is it another lxde app,
Attention, i'm not arguing on what is the best framework for you to use.
I'm just arguing on the fact that right now we have a static "stable" gtk
environment. from this perspective, the Qt development is a simple
experiment that is taking away valuable time that could be use to improve
the gtk rel
so this basically means that lxde will soon be QT based DE correct?
This is the answer i was looking for. If that is going to happen, fine, no
problem. lxde will be qt based and our efforts will focus on Qt. otherwise,
as said, we should focus on improving what we have instead of
experimenting.. o
i don't want to sound annoying, but don't you think you are wasting time
and focus?
GTK2+ , GTK3, Qt.. a lot of "games" but little innovation or "real"
development ..
i have some questions..
where is the project going?
what are the developers goals?
what framework are you choosing to allow peopl
Hello!
Andrea Florio has written on Thursday, 4 July, at 12:14:
>i don't want to sound annoying, but don't you think you are wasting time
>and focus?
>GTK2+ , GTK3, Qt.. a lot of "games" but little innovation or "real"
>development ..
>i have some questions..
>where is the project going?
>
2013/7/4 Andrea Florio :
> Attention, i'm not arguing on what is the best framework for you to use. I'm
> just arguing on the fact that right now we have a static "stable" gtk
> environment. from this perspective, the Qt development is a simple
> experiment that is taking away valuable time that co
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Andrea Florio wrote:
> i don't want to sound annoying, but don't you think you are wasting time and
> focus?
>
> GTK2+ , GTK3, Qt.. a lot of "games" but little innovation or "real"
> development ..
>
> i have some questions..
>
> where is the project going?
> what a
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Really awesome.
>
> And holy hell, the screenshot looks like it could have been Razor-qt.
>
> I'm really glad we have an actively developped file manager and image viewer
> in Qt as those were two apps that were seriously missing.
>
> What
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Really awesome.
>
> And holy hell, the screenshot looks like it could have been Razor-qt.
>
> I'm really glad we have an actively developped file manager and image viewer
> in Qt as those were two apps that were seriously missing.
>
> What
http://blog.lxde.org/?p=1013
I just wrote a blog post about current progress of LXDE-Qt.
Lxpanel-Qt now works (but it's still very basic, rough, and requires
much polishing)
Cheers!
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubun
12 matches
Mail list logo
