Attention, i'm not arguing on what is the best framework for you to use. I'm just arguing on the fact that right now we have a static "stable" gtk environment. from this perspective, the Qt development is a simple experiment that is taking away valuable time that could be use to improve the gtk release.
If you believe that Qt is better, not a problem, let's swap to Qt and develop in Qt... but at one point, better sooner then later, you will have to pick one, and focus your efforts on it. this is why i wrote those questions before... > where is the project going? > what are the developers goals? > what framework are you choosing to allow people to join and be productive? Andrea 2013/7/4 PCMan <pcman...@gmail.com> > This actually makes sense and is not a waste of time. > We need a reliable and productive toolkit for the future. > It's the attitude of upstream authors of the toolkits that really matters. > If they're against their users and only care about their own need and > branding, then it's not the right way to go. > To make the project better, we need a toolkit which is designed for > everyone and cares about different needs. > It's quite frustrating that during new gtk+ release your application > breaks so often. > Seeing what he said when choosing the new kernel scheruler, I think > Linus will also agree that the attitude of the maintainer is > important. > The CK patch sets are quite awesome and I really like them, though. > -- ------------------------------------------ Andrea Florio AT&T Brno - Tier 3 Network Specialist CISCO CCNA, CCNA Wireless, CCNP Certified openSUSE Official Member (anubisg1) Email: and...@opensuse.org Email: af9...@intl.att.com Cell: +39-328-7365667 Cell: +420-776-793519 Website: http://journey4ccie.com/ ------------------------------------------
-- Lubuntu-users mailing list Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
