On 26 January 2016 at 23:14, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Yes, we have narrowed down our problem to this specific patch by
> > removing the patch from the OE gcc patches, rebuilding gcc, and
> > then building our test program with that gcc. The problem goes
> > away when we do so, which points directly to
- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 26 January 2016 at 23:14, Khem Raj < raj.k...@gmail.com > wrote:
>> > Yes, we have narrowed down our problem to this specific patch by
>> > removing the patch from the OE gcc patches, rebuilding gcc, and
>> > then building our test pro
- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:59 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
> - On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> On 26 January 2016 at 23:14, Khem Raj < raj.k...@gmail.com > wrote:
>>> > Yes, we have narrowed down our problem to this specific patch by
>>> > removing the patch from the
