----- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:59 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com> wrote:
> ----- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: >> On 26 January 2016 at 23:14, Khem Raj < raj.k...@gmail.com > wrote: >>> > Yes, we have narrowed down our problem to this specific patch by >>> > removing the patch from the OE gcc patches, rebuilding gcc, and >>> > then building our test program with that gcc. The problem goes >>> > away when we do so, which points directly to that patch as a >>> > culprit. >>> > Test program is attached. >>> Ok I think we can remove this from master and jethro release >> Mathieu, as you found this do you want the glory by submitting a the removal >> patch? > Thanks for asking, but for me a > Reported-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com> > in the patch commit messge is good enough. > You'll probably want to have a link to this discussion thread > also in the commit message. I have a few minutes in front of me, I'll prepare a patch. Thanks, Mathieu > Thanks, > Mathieu >> Cheerss, >> Ross > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > EfficiOS Inc. > http://www.efficios.com > _______________________________________________ > lttng-dev mailing list > lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
_______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
