----- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
> On 26 January 2016 at 23:14, Khem Raj < raj.k...@gmail.com > wrote: >> > Yes, we have narrowed down our problem to this specific patch by >> > removing the patch from the OE gcc patches, rebuilding gcc, and >> > then building our test program with that gcc. The problem goes >> > away when we do so, which points directly to that patch as a >> > culprit. >> > Test program is attached. >> Ok I think we can remove this from master and jethro release > Mathieu, as you found this do you want the glory by submitting a the removal > patch? Thanks for asking, but for me a Reported-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com> in the patch commit messge is good enough. You'll probably want to have a link to this discussion thread also in the commit message. Thanks, Mathieu > Cheerss, > Ross -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
_______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
