On Jan 27, 2016 8:30 AM, "Mathieu Desnoyers"
wrote:
>
> - On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:59 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers <
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com> wrote:
>>
>> - On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Burton, Ross
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 January 2016 at 23:14, Khem Raj wrote:
> Yes, we have nar
- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:59 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
> - On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> On 26 January 2016 at 23:14, Khem Raj < raj.k...@gmail.com > wrote:
>>> > Yes, we have narrowed down our problem to this specific patch by
>>> > removing the patch from the
- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 26 January 2016 at 23:14, Khem Raj < raj.k...@gmail.com > wrote:
>> > Yes, we have narrowed down our problem to this specific patch by
>> > removing the patch from the OE gcc patches, rebuilding gcc, and
>> > then building our test pro
On 26 January 2016 at 23:14, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Yes, we have narrowed down our problem to this specific patch by
> > removing the patch from the OE gcc patches, rebuilding gcc, and
> > then building our test program with that gcc. The problem goes
> > away when we do so, which points directly to
