[Lsr] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-33

2025-01-21 Thread Acee Lindem
Hi Joe, > On Jan 21, 2025, at 11:37, Joe Clarke via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Joe Clarke > Review result: Ready > > I have been asked to review this draft on behalf of the OPS Directorate. This > draft defines a YANG module that augments the base OSPF YANG module to add > Segment Ro

[Lsr] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-33

2025-01-21 Thread Joe Clarke via Datatracker
Reviewer: Joe Clarke Review result: Ready I have been asked to review this draft on behalf of the OPS Directorate. This draft defines a YANG module that augments the base OSPF YANG module to add Segment Routing extensions for both OSPFv2 and OSPFv3. There isn't a lot of text in here beyond the Y

[Lsr] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-33

2025-01-21 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Old-school network management Joe finds that a bit sad that the monitoring side of things might be lacking. Pragmatically, I get where you’re coming from and defer to the WG on what is best for the SDO, vendor and operator communities for SR/OSPF. Joe From: Acee Lindem Date: Tuesday, January

[Lsr] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-33

2025-01-21 Thread Acee Lindem
The WG would welcome your contribution in the area of OSPFv2/OSPFv3 SR statistics. Thanks, Acee > On Jan 21, 2025, at 12:33 PM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote: > > Old-school network management Joe finds that a bit sad that the monitoring > side of things might be lacking. Pragmatically, I get

[Lsr] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-33

2025-01-21 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
I asked the question to see if there were relevant stats. I’m not saying there are (lsr are the experts), but based on your first response it sounds like that hadn’t yet been considered. If there is no need for stats at this time, great! Joe From: Acee Lindem Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2025

[Lsr] Re: IPR Poll for Working Group Last Call of "IGP Flexible Algorithms Reverse Affinity Constraint" - draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-03

2025-01-21 Thread Acee Lindem
Speaking as Co-chair: We've received responses to the IPR poll from all the co-authors. It would be good to get some more reviews and comments from WG members. I know there was discussion of using flex algorithm for multicast use cases in PIM. Thanks, Acee > On Jan 20, 2025, at 11:52 PM, Ami

[Lsr] Re: Working Group Last Call of "IGP Flexible Algorithms Reverse Affinity Constraint" - draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-03

2025-01-21 Thread zhang.zheng
Support the adoption of this draft. The draft is useful for several variant use cases. Thanks, Sandy Original From: AceeLindem To: lsr ; Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity@ietf.org ; Date: 2025年01月17日 03:04 Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call of "IGP Flexible A

[Lsr] Re: Working Group Last Call of "IGP Flexible Algorithms Reverse Affinity Constraint" - draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-03

2025-01-21 Thread Shraddha Hegde
This draft is a useful extension to Flex-algo constraints and I support publication. I have below comments on the draft. 1. I suggest to use the word "admin-group" instead of 'color' in below paragraph "The Flexible Algorithm definition can specify 'colors' that are