Speaking as Co-chair: We've received responses to the IPR poll from all the co-authors.
It would be good to get some more reviews and comments from WG members. I know there was discussion of using flex algorithm for multicast use cases in PIM. Thanks, Acee > On Jan 20, 2025, at 11:52 PM, Amit Dhamija <am...@arrcus.com> wrote: > > Hi Acee, > I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. > Brgds > Amit > From: Acee Lindem <acee.i...@gmail.com> > Date: Friday, 17 January 2025 at 12:22 AM > To: draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity....@ietf.org > <draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity....@ietf.org> > Cc: lsr <lsr@ietf.org> > Subject: IPR Poll for Working Group Last Call of "IGP Flexible Algorithms > Reverse Affinity Constraint" - > draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-03 > Co-Authors, > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-03? > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see > RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > There currently no IPR statements - > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond > to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any > relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing > list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a > response has been received from each author and contributor. > > If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of > any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thanks, > Acee > [EXTERNAL] _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org
