On 02/11/2013 04:09 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
I realize that we don't do it to have DVD's (I don't know anyone in my
LoCo who still uses disc media to install Ubuntu.) but instead the
DVD's is just another tool to further the effort.
I wonder how many groups do go through the approval / reap
LoCo teams need not be approved to manage a website or register a domain
containing the Ubuntu wordmark.
On Feb 11, 2013 1:32 AM, "Christophe Sauthier (Huats)" <
christophe.sauth...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:50 AM, YoBoY wrote:
> > Le 11/02/2013 09:09, Benjamin Kerensa a éc
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:50 AM, YoBoY wrote:
> Le 11/02/2013 09:09, Benjamin Kerensa a écrit :
>
>>
>> IMHO contributing at the local community level should be the least
>> bureaucratic and easiest process in the community.
>>
>
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> And it is the easiest way to contribute for lot o
Hi YoBoy,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:50 AM, YoBoY wrote:
> Le 11/02/2013 09:09, Benjamin Kerensa a écrit :
>
>>
>> IMHO contributing at the local community level should be the least
>> bureaucratic and easiest process in the community.
>>
>
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> And it is the easiest way to contribu
Le 11/02/2013 09:09, Benjamin Kerensa a écrit :
IMHO contributing at the local community level should be the least
bureaucratic and easiest process in the community.
Hi Benjamin,
And it is the easiest way to contribute for lot of users in my
community. They contribute to the localised resso
Hi YoBoy,
But that’s the issue the resources being sponsored are not community
resources they are entirely from the commercial side of Canonical. It
is not the LoCo Council or Community Council handing this stuff out
and there are no other benefits of becoming approved except for
getting those res
I agree with the phrase "Sponsored" while at the same time I think YoBoy
has pointed out a seemingly important issue.
Which is sponsorship is nice albeit its not a reward or recognition the
reality is that LoCo's do a lot of hard work marketing Ubuntu to get this
label of recognition just so they
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 2:07 PM, YoBoY wrote:
> Le 09/02/2013 01:20, Grant Bowman a écrit :
>
>> +1 for "Sponsored" which seems to have a majority from my unscientific
>> view reading along.
>>
>
> Really? Another fork of the topic?
>
> The "sponsored" term just make me smile, and it's so linked wi
Le 09/02/2013 01:20, Grant Bowman a écrit :
+1 for "Sponsored" which seems to have a majority from my unscientific
view reading along.
Really? Another fork of the topic?
The "sponsored" term just make me smile, and it's so linked with the
commercial part of Canonical. We are not really spons
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 16:20 -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
> I am with "Ubuntu California"
This is where you have to decide if your an actor on behalf of the
Ubuntu California Local Community, or an individual associated with
other individuals in the Local Community.
In my travels, I hardly ever say
+1 for "Sponsored" which seems to have a majority from my unscientific
view reading along.
I also like the term "Teams."
If a discussion of terms has come about, I feel a more substantial and
little discussed issue is the shortened version of Local Community,
LoCo, crazy in Spanish. This term is
11 matches
Mail list logo
