Am 12.08.2010 22:40, schrieb Laura Czajkowski:
> If you log into the LoCo Directory (LD) you'll see some teams not
> listed under a country. In order to fix this, PLEASE select lanuage(s)
> under your team. Many teams have not done this and it would help tidy up
> some of the teams so they are
On 30.06.2010 16:08, Sense Hofstede wrote:
> Please do note that in order to change the information about your team
> in the LoCo directory you need to be an administrator of the Launchpad
> team that is recognised as the main team of your LoCo. There is no way
> to give other people the permission
On 29 June 2010 22:46, Laura Czajkowski wrote:
>
> Aloha folks!
>
> Me again! We've been looking for team contact information on the LoCo
> Directory and noticed some teams do not have team information displayed
> under resources on their team page even though they do have a website,
> wiki page
On 10/06/10 15:05, Michael wrote:
> We have been asked to add a meeting tracking feature to
> http://loco.ubuntu.com which will replace the use of Wiki pages for
> planning the meeting times and agenda.
>
> To this end, we are drafting a specification to provide this, and would
> like the your feed
Op donderdag 25-03-2010 om 11:57 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Dan
Trevino:
> Just thinking out loud here, each of the LoCo teams should already be
> associated with one-to-many timezone(s). Why not just ask the event
> creator to specify it?
>
> For my case, when I create a new event for Florida
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:41 PM, David Rubin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote:
>> Dan Trevino wrote:
>> [..]
>>
>>> If nobody wants to go through the small data entry task of entering
>>> teams and their associated TZ, then just allow the team admin(s) to
>>> selec
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote:
> Dan Trevino wrote:
> [..]
>
>> If nobody wants to go through the small data entry task of entering
>> teams and their associated TZ, then just allow the team admin(s) to
>> select default timezone(s) available for their team.
>
> Ahem... a
Dan Trevino wrote:
[..]
> If nobody wants to go through the small data entry task of entering
> teams and their associated TZ, then just allow the team admin(s) to
> select default timezone(s) available for their team.
Ahem... a team may span several time zones! Just sayin' :)
And..
> On Wed,
From: Ubuntu local community team LoCo contacts
To: Ubuntu local community team LoCo contacts
Subject: Re: LoCo Directory developers would like some input
Date: 25/03/10 16:07
> Whats the potential of just letting the event organizer enter the time
> with timezone, then store that va
Whats the potential of just letting the event organizer enter the time
with timezone, then store that value in the DB as UTC along with the
timezone that it was entered against. Then when a user visits the page
use Javascript and Ajax to store against that users session there
timezone, and just cha
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Laura Czajkowski wrote:
> Aloha!
>
> As many of you know the LoCo directory is up and running and with that
> is the events section. Many teams have added their Global Jam details
> to it, well done it's looking great! I'm posting here as the developers
> would l
What about displaying both timezones, local for the event according to
venue and the UTC one. I'll see about trying it out...
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Daniel Holbach
wrote:
> On 24.03.2010 20:05, Fabian Rodriguez wrote:
>> Ask the first-time visitors "What time is it for you right now ?"
On 24.03.2010 20:05, Fabian Rodriguez wrote:
> Ask the first-time visitors "What time is it for you right now ?" and
> store that as a cookie.
That sounds nice, but it might be problematic with DST changes.
I'd very much be in favour in a solution without any magic or crazy
assumptions as it's in
The coordinates of the location/google maps will ALWAYS give you the
right time zone where the events are hosted.
I think that making the teams enter the events in UTC time really is a
bad idea. I personally find it very annoying.
But asking me for the time zone is reasonable. Converting local ti
Laura Czajkowski wrote:
[...]
> Our question to the community is, what would be the impact on your use
> of loco.ubuntu.com for planning local events, if times were entered and
> displayed in UTC,instead of local time. If the burden is not great, we
> will do that. If the burden is enough to sig
Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote:
> Legendario wrote:
>
>> But besides Quebec there is Vancouver too, isn`t it? I believe that it
>> is due to the large size of these cities which must have their own
>> demands. Am I wrong?
>>
Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver are the three largest citie
Fabian Rodriguez wrote:
> Legendario wrote:
>> But besides Quebec there is Vancouver too, isn`t it? I believe that it
>> is due to the large size of these cities which must have their own
>> demands. Am I wrong?
>
> There is Quebec the city and Quebec the province. Then there's..
Oh right! I forg
Legendario wrote:
> But besides Quebec there is Vancouver too, isn`t it? I believe that it
> is due to the large size of these cities which must have their own
> demands. Am I wrong?
There is Quebec the city and Quebec the province. Then there's..
Let's do this over a beer, shall we ? :)
F.
--
Legendario wrote:
> But besides Quebec there is Vancouver too, isn`t it? I believe that it
> is due to the large size of these cities which must have their own
> demands. Am I wrong?
Yes, Quebec is a province not a city ;)
-Jonathan
--
loco-contacts mailing list
loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com
But besides Quebec there is Vancouver too, isn`t it? I believe that it is
due to the large size of these cities which must have their own demands. Am
I wrong?
Cheers,
Kemel Zaidan aka Legendario
Coordenador Ubuntu-BR-SP
jabber: legendario ARROBA jabber.org
twitter: @kemelzaidan
Eu prefiro receb
Legendario wrote:
[...]
> I`ve made a research on the loco directory, and Canada and Russia also
> have state loco teams too. The suggestions you made seem very good to
> me, and also based on what is actually practiced.
If you referred to Ubuntu Quebec, really, it doesn't have much to do
with Ubu
I have been talking to the ubuntu-br council about this, but as far as I
know, they`re also uncertain about the right answer for that. I believe that
their practice is already something pretty close to the ubuntu-us case.
Brazil is too big and it`s not viable for them to promote an install fest,
fo
Op zaterdag 06-02-2010 om 23:07 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Rubén
Romero y Cordero:
> Remember that Brazil is a big country with almos 200 milion
> people: Federative Republic of Brazil -
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazil
>
> Big countries, such as the US or European countries, do have their
El 6 de febrero de 2010 21:25, Rubén Romero y Cordero
escribió:
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Dan Trevino wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
> >
>>
>> There is an ubuntu-us! We serve mainly as an umbrella and guidance
>> group for the various US state loco teams.
>> http://www.ubuntu-us.org/
>>
>> Sp
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Dan Trevino wrote:
> [...]
>
>
>
> There is an ubuntu-us! We serve mainly as an umbrella and guidance
> group for the various US state loco teams.
> http://www.ubuntu-us.org/
>
> Spanish speaking teams have a cooperation umbrella and a coordination
umbrella:
Foc
So do we have Ubuntu-BR also, and it should act the same as ubuntu-us.
Truly, I don't see why it should be different.
The problem is that I don't know if we are an official team or even if we
have the possibility to be one. I'd like the LoCo Council to answer this
question.
I've be warned by the
2010/2/6 Rubén Romero y Cordero :
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Legendario
> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, we are part of the approved Brazilian loco team so, I believe that
>> this makes us a loco team and also an approved one. At least this is what
>> have been told to us. Am I right?
>
> Remember
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Legendario wrote:
> Yes, we are part of the approved Brazilian loco team so, I believe that
> this makes us a loco team and also an approved one. At least this is what
> have been told to us. Am I right?
>
>
Remember that Brazil is a big country with almos 200 mili
Yes, we are part of the approved Brazilian loco team so, I believe that this
makes us a loco team and also an approved one. At least this is what have
been told to us. Am I right?
I'd like someone that can tell me if that is true or not because if it
isn't, I am going to apply the team for approva
Hi,
Our LoCo Team received the invitation and it was accepted :)
Thanks
--
Nizar Kerkeni
LoCo ubuntu-tn and ubuntu member
http://www.ubuntu-tn.org
http://blog.nizarus.org
--
loco-contacts mailing list
loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
2009/12/14 Legendario :
> As long as I know, my Loco-Team is an approved-one but it`s listed as
> non-approved. How can I know if it is or not?
ubuntu-br-sp is not a LoCo team, it is part of the approved brazilian LoCo team.
cheers,
Martin
--
loco-contacts mailing list
loco-contacts@lists.ubun
mine bragging :)
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Efrain Valles wrote:
> I will see that this is included in the wiki, good point. On the other
> hand, what bragging are you reffering to?
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Jan Husar wrote:
> > thanks,
> >
> > I think the main problem here is c
I will see that this is included in the wiki, good point. On the other
hand, what bragging are you reffering to?
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Jan Husar wrote:
> thanks,
>
> I think the main problem here is communication, since
> I cannot find any relevant guidelines to these changes
> on the
thanks,
I think the main problem here is communication, since
I cannot find any relevant guidelines to these changes
on the wiki. If someone write something relevant we could follow that and
don't need to brag about it :)
Jan
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Efrain Valles wrote:
> well i trie
well i tried to add everyone to the approved teams but the respective
admins had to accept the invitation. Some Teams are just acepting the
invitations now. if you didn't get an invitation please email the loco
council and we will sort this out.
loco-council _AT_ lists _DOT_ubuntu _DOT_ com
On Mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ya, we're working on this but there's a lot going on that's been
keeping it from happening. Hopefully with the static XML being output
and some time to finish developing specs and some eager developers we
can really get this moving.
There are new tech
Another great thing to see would be all of the teams on an interactive map
I filed a bug for this last year https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/253545
Looks like it's being worked on already!
https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-drupal-locomap/+spec/finish-locomap-6.x
On Fri, Dec 11, 20
same here,
we are approved since 2005
Jan
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Legendario wrote:
> As long as I know, my Loco-Team is an approved-one but it`s listed as
> non-approved. How can I know if it is or not?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kemel Zaidan aka Legendario
>
>
> 2009/12/11 Daniel Holbach
>
> H
As long as I know, my Loco-Team is an approved-one but it`s listed as
non-approved. How can I know if it is or not?
Thanks,
Kemel Zaidan aka Legendario
2009/12/11 Daniel Holbach
> Hello everybody,
>
> after hours of work of lots of nice people, we're happy to announce
>
>http://loco.ubunt
I am not sure I understand what you mean, separate the ones that are
missing some info, this can be easily done, maybe we can add a bar at
the top of team details encouraging the admin to add more data...
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Martin Owens wrote:
> I proposed the idea on IRC, but no on
On 2009-12-10, at 13:35, David Planella wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Daniel Holbach and an awesome group of other community members have been
> doing their usual awesome stuff and have now the LoCo directory [1] up
> and running.
>
> As a tool for the LoCo teams, it naturally supports
> internationaliz
I proposed the idea on IRC, but no one was online, that we take all
teams without added data and list them in an uncategorised section.
All teams with data would be categorised by the country, region and city
supplied by the team owner.
Martin,
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 16:09 -0430, Efrain Valles wr
All naming comes atraight from launchpad. Once the team fixes this in
the teams details in launchpad, it should be taken care of
2009/12/11, Danny Piccirillo :
> Very nice! But the naming conventions need to be fixed.
>
> Three US teams include united states while the rest just go by the state
> n
Very nice! But the naming conventions need to be fixed.
Three US teams include united states while the rest just go by the state
name. Some teams use initials while others use the entire name. That should
be sorted out. Perhaps it can be alphabetized by country, and then the US
and similar places
Hi!
Such a nice surprise!
Dolev
The head of the israeli LoCo team
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Holbach
Reply-to: "Ubuntu local community team \(LoCo\) contacts"
To: Ubuntu local community team (LoCo) contacts
Subject: LoCo Directory
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:59:24 +0100
Hello e
On 10.12.2009 17:01, Aron Xu wrote:
> I have translated over half of the strings to Chinese (Simplified) on
> Launchpad in weeks before, but only very few Chinese appear on the
> site, do other languages have the same problem?
I'll do an update of the translations soon.
Thanks a lot for your work
I have translated over half of the strings to Chinese (Simplified) on
Launchpad in weeks before, but only very few Chinese appear on the
site, do other languages have the same problem?
Regards,
Aron Xu
--
loco-contacts mailing list
loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/
Re,
>> Our Tunisian LoCo was approved on July 2008
>> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncilAgenda/20080722) and it's marked
>> as non
>> approved on : http://loco.ubuntu.com/teams/ubuntu-tn
>> Why ??
>
> It's not member of ~locoteams-approved as far as I can see.
>
Yes, I remember that I contact
On 10.12.2009 15:02, Nizar Kerkeni wrote:
> Our Tunisian LoCo was approved on July 2008
> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncilAgenda/20080722) and it's marked as non
> approved on : http://loco.ubuntu.com/teams/ubuntu-tn
> Why ??
It's not member of ~locoteams-approved as far as I can see.
Have a
Hello;
Our Tunisian LoCo was approved on July 2008
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncilAgenda/20080722) and it's marked as non
approved on : http://loco.ubuntu.com/teams/ubuntu-tn
Why ??
original message-
De: "Efrain Valles" effie-j...@ubuntu.com
A: "Fran Diéguez"
There is, just make sure the galician team in launchpad joins the
~locoteams group in launchypad nad LD should sync the info
regards
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Fran Diéguez wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi David,
>
> I cant' see our Galician (gl_ES) LoCo team
Sorry for all inconveniences. but I will get this up for tomorrow
morning. I have better connection at the office.
thanks for helping out
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Efrain Valles wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have setup a clean 0.1 sandbox. The edit form glitch is clear.
> please do give it a
Thanks for the good news jono.
I will be dedicating some significant time to the xml output in the
coming days. I need to get done with some contractred developer an
will see this gets done.
Thanks for all the input
On 8/18/09, Jono Bacon wrote:
> On 08/17/2009 08:38 PM, Martin Owens wrote:
>>
On 08/17/2009 08:38 PM, Martin Owens wrote:
> Hey Jono,
>
> Fantastic, the quicker it's out the quicker 2.0 can come :-) I'm waiting
> for the xml out so I can so some funky svg maps based on it.
>
>
It will be awesome. :-)
> Hows life Jono, you've been all quiet in the loco realm.
>
>
All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Agreed. I'm ecstatic to see this project running in the wild. Of course
I'm also extremely anxious for the xml as well.
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:38:23 -0400
Martin Owens wrote:
> Hey Jono,
>
> Fantastic, the quicker it's out the quicker 2.0 can come
Hey Jono,
Fantastic, the quicker it's out the quicker 2.0 can come :-) I'm waiting
for the xml out so I can so some funky svg maps based on it.
Hows life Jono, you've been all quiet in the loco realm.
Martin,
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 19:14 -0700, Jono Bacon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just a quick updat
56 matches
Mail list logo
