llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld
Author: Daniil Kovalev (kovdan01)
Changes
1. Sign return address before storing into stack.
2. Treat lazy resolver address as signed.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116334.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) lld/ELF/Arc
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-powerpc
Author: Akshat Oke (optimisan)
Changes
With this, all machine SSA optimization passes are available in the new codegen
pipeline.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116326.diff
16 Files Affected:
- (modified) llv
https://github.com/aheejin milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115844
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Valentin Clement (バレンタイン クレメン)
Date: 2024-11-15T17:44:34-08:00
New Revision: 61999d7f2a3f86a0633fc3033805447f1508e6da
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/61999d7f2a3f86a0633fc3033805447f1508e6da
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/61999d7f2a3f86a0633fc30338054
Author: Valentin Clement (バレンタイン クレメン)
Date: 2024-11-15T17:44:34-08:00
New Revision: 61999d7f2a3f86a0633fc3033805447f1508e6da
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/61999d7f2a3f86a0633fc3033805447f1508e6da
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/61999d7f2a3f86a0633fc30338054
Meinersbur wrote:
Rebase to main. Not extensively tested, not all configurations may work. I also
still have to address `-fno-exceptions` and `INSTALL_WITH_TOOLCHAIN` that I
didn't have time to address before the weekend.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110217
___
https://github.com/Meinersbur updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112188
>From 42e5abb5b291e78aeb152d7c636c75fe4d90492a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Kruse
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 13:55:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Split headers in preparation for cross-compilation. NFC.
dpaoliello wrote:
> @dpaoliello (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix
> in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with
> a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add
> the release:note label to this PR.
F
https://github.com/Sisyph approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116312
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
t-lutz wrote:
We're looking at this internally at NVIDIA; we typically don't expect builtins
to changes on a patch release and we'll have to accommodate for that in our
frontend.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111660
___
llvm-branch-commit
tru wrote:
Ugh. This is unfortunate. I have no preference in how to fix this properly. Do
we know anyone working on NVCC that can chime in? @joker-eph - do you know the
right people?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111660
___
llvm-branch-co
AaronBallman wrote:
> It is an ugly situation that a point release fixes one problem but breaks
> another.
100% agreed, it's an unfortunate situation to be in.
> Preferably get intended behavior in both cases but we don't live in a perfect
> world and do live with compromises.
Agreed, thoug
https://github.com/Artem-B updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115081
>From ed0fe30e7d4da94b13018e563971524e013c512f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manasij Mukherjee
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:15:30 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [NVPTX] Promote v2i8 to v2i16 (#89)
Promote v2i8 to v2i1
Artem-B wrote:
That would be me -- I did the review of the original patch and just doing the
legwork here to cherry-pick it into the 19.x branch.
If you need somebody else, I'd ask @AlexMaclean
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115081
___
ll
@@ -1494,7 +1494,8 @@ def FeatureISAVersion9_5_Common : FeatureSet<
[FeatureFP8Insts,
FeatureFP8ConversionInsts,
FeatureCvtFP8VOP1Bug,
- FeatureGFX950Insts
+ FeatureGFX950Insts,
+ FeatureAddressableLocalMemorySize163840
arsenm wrote:
It does end
@@ -919,6 +920,7 @@ bool isWritableObject(const Value *Object, bool
&ExplicitlyDereferenceableOnly);
class AAManager : public AnalysisInfoMixin {
public:
using Result = AAResults;
+ using LegacyWrapper = AAResultsWrapperPass;
arsenm wrote:
Why do you need
@@ -1494,7 +1494,8 @@ def FeatureISAVersion9_5_Common : FeatureSet<
[FeatureFP8Insts,
FeatureFP8ConversionInsts,
FeatureCvtFP8VOP1Bug,
- FeatureGFX950Insts
+ FeatureGFX950Insts,
+ FeatureAddressableLocalMemorySize163840
jayfoad wrote:
This means
AaronBallman wrote:
Yes. but other builtins were also impacted and went from returning true (18.x)
to false (19.x) to true (20.x): https://godbolt.org/z/8vPvzb81x
Just to double-check assumptions -- we don't know of any builtins which Clang
now reports true for which Clang does not actually su
ye-luo wrote:
I tried __reference_converts_from_temporary https://godbolt.org/z/TPjbqWT67
18.1.0, 19.1.0 both return false
19.1.2 and main returns true.
I have no issue with __has_builtin fixed in the main but the resulted behavior
change in a point release is a bit trouble some.
https://github
ye-luo wrote:
> Just to double-check assumptions -- we don't know of any builtins which Clang
> now reports true for which Clang does not actually support? And we don't know
> of any builtins which Clang now reports false for which Clang does actually
> support? IOW, `__has_builtin` is not lyi
@@ -1040,13 +1040,23 @@ AArch64BtiPac::AArch64BtiPac(Ctx &ctx) : AArch64(ctx) {
void AArch64BtiPac::writePltHeader(uint8_t *buf) const {
const uint8_t btiData[] = { 0x5f, 0x24, 0x03, 0xd5 }; // bti c
+ const uint8_t signLR[] = {0x7f, 0x23, 0x03, 0xd5};// pacibsp
cons
cor3ntin wrote:
this patch fixes the regression in 1.9.2 (or 3, I do not remember). I have
absolutely no idea why it would cause issues with nvcc though
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111660
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-
erichkeane wrote:
Note that the NVCC thing here is that NVCC has an interesting programming model
for its offload.
My understanding is that:
-Uses the (in this case) Clang Preprocessor to process the code.
-Does some messing around with that preprocessed output, generating the device
code, pl
https://github.com/skatrak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116219
>From 28770c74a70089589886a1b91208fc8b06cb82b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sergio Afonso
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:24:15 +
Subject: [PATCH] [Flang][OpenMP] Lowering of host-evaluated clauses
This patch a
AaronBallman wrote:
> @tru This change breaks use of llvm 19.1.2 and 19.1.3 #113125 Can it be
> reverted on the release branch?
Oof, that's unfortunate because this is cherry picking a fix where Clang 19
started returning `false` for `__has_builtin(__reference_binds_to_temporary)`
when it was
ye-luo wrote:
> Hmm. Is this really a regression? Which is what we usually only fix at this
> point. It seems like a "feature". What's the risk of this creating problems
> for users already adopted 19.x?
It is not a regression but a bug fix. The issue has been there for years. NVHPC
ships the
https://github.com/skatrak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116052
>From b5571bed993b32eadcc7f80f110bfe73438bd1f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sergio Afonso
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:49:28 +
Subject: [PATCH] [MLIR][OpenMP] LLVM IR translation of host_eval
This patch adds
ye-luo wrote:
This change breaks use of llvm 19.1.2 and 19.1.3
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/113125
Can it be reverted on the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111660
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-br
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116097
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2024-11-15T08:04:17-05:00
New Revision: 2a02b2ef960820c9045fe180c403583598a98044
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2a02b2ef960820c9045fe180c403583598a98044
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2a02b2ef960820c9045fe180c403583598a98044.diff
https://github.com/paperchalice approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116326
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Tom Natan
Date: 2024-11-15T11:51:24Z
New Revision: 6028618116f542ad62010400c9d1868ea79b7962
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6028618116f542ad62010400c9d1868ea79b7962
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6028618116f542ad62010400c9d1868ea79b7962.diff
LOG: Rev
mgorny wrote:
> Can someone confirm that the CI test failures are not important in this case?
It seems to be a timeout/CI problem ("agent lost"), rather than an actual
failure.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115892
___
llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
It would be good if @serge-sans-paille can review this backport, as it's
substantially different from the patch on main, and he's the most familiar with
this code.
The other PR linked above is, as I understand it, not a replacement for this
one -- it makes additional fixes in the
https://github.com/wangpc-pp updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115858
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/wangpc-pp updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115858
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/wangpc-pp updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115843
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/wangpc-pp updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115843
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: 2024-11-15T09:21:07+01:00
New Revision: 3f9b36d195927e7aa0c133cd2d1efcc489b5fb7c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3f9b36d195927e7aa0c133cd2d1efcc489b5fb7c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3f9b36d195927e7aa0c133cd2d1efcc489b5fb7c.diff
LOG
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114089
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Balazs Benics
Date: 2024-11-15T10:27:44+01:00
New Revision: 42c0948d6102cf3f5a7baad52db5e16aaf5eacc8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/42c0948d6102cf3f5a7baad52db5e16aaf5eacc8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/42c0948d6102cf3f5a7baad52db5e16aaf5eacc8.diff
@@ -1644,9 +1652,36 @@ bool PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeRecurrence(MachineInstr
&PHI) {
return Changed;
}
-bool PeepholeOptimizer::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
+PreservedAnalyses
+PeepholeOptimizerPass::run(MachineFunction &MF,
+ Mach
https://github.com/optimisan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116326
>From 269e1d821f4a1e14967bde977eff921d769f7fcf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akshat Oke
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 06:40:27 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [CodeGen][NewPM] Port PeepholeOptimizer to NPM
---
llvm/inc
kovdan01 wrote:
Both changes from the PR description require dynamic loader support, which
seems missing for glibc (see discussion in
https://discord.com/channels/636084430946959380/1133112394701348895/1298121731428585564).
However, I don't think that it should prevent us from supporting this
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114951
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/kovdan01 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116334
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/kovdan01 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116334
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tru wrote:
Who can review this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115081
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Anutosh Bhat
Date: 2024-11-15T09:22:46+01:00
New Revision: ec947f9d3315bd6654709b143ed4b5b98899524e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ec947f9d3315bd6654709b143ed4b5b98899524e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ec947f9d3315bd6654709b143ed4b5b98899524e.diff
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114197
>From 863b2e599016ada8b2f4cc4d8c59eb7d8f61ee7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:27:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [C++20] [Modules] Fix the duplicated static initializer
problem (#11419
https://github.com/kovdan01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116334
>From f3584a0660270a07cc446e31175a93965ebffd3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniil Kovalev
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:46:22 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [PAC][lld] Use PAC instructions in PLT header with `-z
pac-pl
tru wrote:
What's the current state of this? Is this one ready to be merged or should we
merge the other PR that @serge-sans-paille linked to?
@nikic what's your thoughts?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114786
___
llvm-branch-commits maili
Author: Alan Wu
Date: 2024-11-15T09:21:47+01:00
New Revision: 19026a48df57f101169e2898a798244fbbd383fc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/19026a48df57f101169e2898a798244fbbd383fc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/19026a48df57f101169e2898a798244fbbd383fc.diff
LOG:
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: 2024-11-15T09:21:07+01:00
New Revision: 499eae983bf433fc569231d36bc3dbabd0940bb5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/499eae983bf433fc569231d36bc3dbabd0940bb5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/499eae983bf433fc569231d36bc3dbabd0940bb5.diff
LOG
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-11-15T09:19:40+01:00
New Revision: 7b6ee6e053fe24da790deccc0dd8fa49c6d3543d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7b6ee6e053fe24da790deccc0dd8fa49c6d3543d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7b6ee6e053fe24da790deccc0dd8fa49c6d3543d.diff
LOG:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@Fznamznon (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@dpaoliello (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112855
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112855
>From c9e8540d6c87ecd5a5057a9b0fe47d63affe3062 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mariya Podchishchaeva
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 10:18:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Fix C23 constexpr crashes (#112708)
Before using a c
Author: Mariya Podchishchaeva
Date: 2024-11-15T09:26:14+01:00
New Revision: c9e8540d6c87ecd5a5057a9b0fe47d63affe3062
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c9e8540d6c87ecd5a5057a9b0fe47d63affe3062
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c9e8540d6c87ecd5a5057a9b0fe47d63affe30
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116273
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@antoniofrighetto (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this
fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment
with a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please
add the release:note label to thi
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116273
>From 81005af65fa40638d8766b1b10bdb0dd705bf782 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Paoliello
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 15:35:03 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm][aarch64] Fix Arm64EC name mangling algorithm (#115567)
Arm
Author: Daniel Paoliello
Date: 2024-11-15T09:25:53+01:00
New Revision: 81005af65fa40638d8766b1b10bdb0dd705bf782
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/81005af65fa40638d8766b1b10bdb0dd705bf782
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/81005af65fa40638d8766b1b10bdb0dd705bf782.di
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116104
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116104
>From ffc48250bca5128795084f4af721d310f49f3e27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antonio Frighetto
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:45:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [InstCombine] Intersect nowrap flags between geps while
folding
Author: Antonio Frighetto
Date: 2024-11-15T09:25:18+01:00
New Revision: ffc48250bca5128795084f4af721d310f49f3e27
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ffc48250bca5128795084f4af721d310f49f3e27
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ffc48250bca5128795084f4af721d310f49f3e27.d
tru wrote:
Hmm. Is this really a regression? Which is what we usually only fix at this
point. It seems like a "feature". What's the risk of this creating problems for
users already adopted 19.x?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115944
___
ll
tru wrote:
Can someone confirm that the CI test failures are not important in this case?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115892
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@aheejin (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
h
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115848
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115848
>From ec947f9d3315bd6654709b143ed4b5b98899524e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anutosh Bhat <87052487+anutosh...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 11:39:14 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-repl] Fix undefin
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@XrXr (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the
release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or
two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
http
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115006
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@SixWeining (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115006
>From 19026a48df57f101169e2898a798244fbbd383fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Wu
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:16:17 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [compiler-rt] Stop using x86 builtin on AArch64 with GCC
(#93890)
Previou
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114958
>From 76ca2e0566c8589c0b4f91faea5ce6ed3536a384 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 15:39:15 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [LoongArch][Clang] Add tests for #110834 (#114509)
(cherry picked fro
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114958
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: 2024-11-15T09:21:07+01:00
New Revision: 0c5f639d8e61957b5ea31af8a3ecf588ce9864af
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0c5f639d8e61957b5ea31af8a3ecf588ce9864af
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0c5f639d8e61957b5ea31af8a3ecf588ce9864af.diff
LOG
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: 2024-11-15T09:21:07+01:00
New Revision: 6a668bce7b50807e861d4769ad1a253a0579d4ad
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6a668bce7b50807e861d4769ad1a253a0579d4ad
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6a668bce7b50807e861d4769ad1a253a0579d4ad.diff
LOG
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: 2024-11-15T09:21:06+01:00
New Revision: 76ca2e0566c8589c0b4f91faea5ce6ed3536a384
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/76ca2e0566c8589c0b4f91faea5ce6ed3536a384
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/76ca2e0566c8589c0b4f91faea5ce6ed3536a384.diff
LOG
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@zyn0217 (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
h
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2024-11-15T09:20:15+01:00
New Revision: 33c4723541d7de5399e07c1fb48c5e779c3fb564
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/33c4723541d7de5399e07c1fb48c5e779c3fb564
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/33c4723541d7de5399e07c1fb48c5e779c3fb564.diff
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114951
>From 33c4723541d7de5399e07c1fb48c5e779c3fb564 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:25:35 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] release/19.x: [Clang] Consider outer instantiation scopes for
constrai
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@owenca (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the
release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or
two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
ht
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114640
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114640
>From 7b6ee6e053fe24da790deccc0dd8fa49c6d3543d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 18:47:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Fix a regression in parsing `switch` in macro
call (#114506
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@mstorsjo (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114229
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Martin Storsjö
Date: 2024-11-15T09:18:42+01:00
New Revision: 430c4952286f11a19dea9ad1881792442370470d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/430c4952286f11a19dea9ad1881792442370470d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/430c4952286f11a19dea9ad1881792442370470d.diff
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114229
>From 430c4952286f11a19dea9ad1881792442370470d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Martin=20Storsj=C3=B6?=
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 23:45:14 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [compiler-rt] [test] Fix using toolchains that re
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@topperc (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
h
Author: Craig Topper
Date: 2024-11-15T09:17:52+01:00
New Revision: 2d8ee3a2d800b218a6c11de738e702148bca4f27
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2d8ee3a2d800b218a6c11de738e702148bca4f27
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2d8ee3a2d800b218a6c11de738e702148bca4f27.diff
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114089
>From 2d8ee3a2d800b218a6c11de738e702148bca4f27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Craig Topper
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 22:31:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [RISCV] Don't delete all fixups in
RISCVMCCodeEmitter::expandLongCond
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115006
>From 04e2bbec3e0abaddbbb0aac8a521fa834ec22b7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Wu
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:16:17 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [compiler-rt] Stop using x86 builtin on AArch64 with GCC
(#93890)
Previou
kovdan01 wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/116334?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning"
https://github.com/kovdan01 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116334
1. Sign return address before storing into stack.
2. Treat lazy resolver address as signed.
>From 7fbca897414b538d2b528cc8ca54a89d38ba3c6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniil Kovalev
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024
97 matches
Mail list logo