ye-luo wrote: > Just to double-check assumptions -- we don't know of any builtins which Clang > now reports true for which Clang does not actually support? And we don't know > of any builtins which Clang now reports false for which Clang does actually > support? IOW, `__has_builtin` is not lying after landing these changes, right?
I have little knowledge about builtin. At least `__has_builtin` is not lying about `__reference_converts_from_temporary`. So, probably I will just live with this change in the point release. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111660 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
