nikic wrote:

It would be good if @serge-sans-paille can review this backport, as it's 
substantially different from the patch on main, and he's the most familiar with 
this code.

The other PR linked above is, as I understand it, not a replacement for this 
one -- it makes additional fixes in the same area.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114786
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to