Re: [lldb-dev] lists.llvm.org server maintenance, Friday Dec 18 @10:30 PST

2015-12-18 Thread Tanya Lattner via lldb-dev
The server maintenance is complete and lists should be operational. Thanks, Tanya > On Dec 17, 2015, at 12:06 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > > All, > > The server that runs the mailing lists will be down for maintenance starting > Friday Dec 18th at 10:30PM PST. I do not expect a long downtime, b

Re: [lldb-dev] turning on tests for OS X llvm.org Green Dragon builder

2015-12-18 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Hi all, This is complete. We now have OS X running the tests (both gtest and Python tests) at the end of the build phase on the LLVM Green Dragon OS X build. This build: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/LLDB/job/LLDB/15459/ is the first build where I got everything working. It already sends

Re: [lldb-dev] turning on tests for OS X llvm.org Green Dragon builder

2015-12-18 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Still in progress. I've got the tests running, but I've still got some configuration issues to work out to get them running cleanly. On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Todd Fiala wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm working on turning this on soon here (sometime this afternoon). It is > possible that we'll

Re: [lldb-dev] building on mac

2015-12-18 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Hi Ryan! I talked to Sean Callanan about this. We think the real fix is probably tracking down why llvm/clang are thinking it is okay to assume we want to use the ocaml bindings without actually saying we want to use them. Anything we do on our end looks like it would be a hack to avoid a broken

[lldb-dev] turning on tests for OS X llvm.org Green Dragon builder

2015-12-18 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Hi all, I'm working on turning this on soon here (sometime this afternoon). It is possible that we'll see a bit of noise as I get it going. If we get erroneous output from the builder while I get this settled, I'll be sure to post on that email thread. I'll send out a "it's really on" email onc

Re: [lldb-dev] building on mac

2015-12-18 Thread Ryan Brown via lldb-dev
Where do I find the script xcode is using? -- Ryan Brown On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Todd Fiala wrote: > Right: > > "Okay, this might be the llvm/clang build script that Xcode uses as an > llvm/clang build step. That's going to need to be updated if it is using > configure (for the reaso

Re: [lldb-dev] building on mac

2015-12-18 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Right: "Okay, this might be the llvm/clang build script that Xcode uses as an llvm/clang build step. That's going to need to be updated if it is using configure (for the reasons I mentioned above)." On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: > Are the Xcode scripts using the llv

Re: [lldb-dev] building on mac

2015-12-18 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
Are the Xcode scripts using the llvm configure build? If so they will need to be changed to the CMake build sooner or later, because the configure build is going away in the near future. On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:18 PM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Ah. > > Okay, thi

Re: [lldb-dev] r255887 - TestGlobalVariables.py

2015-12-18 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Hi Ewan, Scratch that. I started poking at it with Greg and we're going to try to fix this over here. I will temporarily mark as XFAIL on Darwin. You have no action to take here. Thanks! -Todd On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Todd Fiala wrote: > Hi Ewan! > > r255887 has broken the tests on

[lldb-dev] [Bug 25872] OS X: TestGlobalVariables dwarf is not finding the static const int g_file_static_int

2015-12-18 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25872 Todd Fiala changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |clayb...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Todd Fiala

[lldb-dev] r255887 - TestGlobalVariables.py

2015-12-18 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Hi Ewan! r255887 has broken the tests on OS X for the dwarf version of that test. Can you please either fix it to work on OS X, or revert the change? I'm not interested in disabling that test on OS X since it covers important functionality. Thank you! Now that the test rerun support is in, I'll

Re: [lldb-dev] Passing as argument an array in a function call

2015-12-18 Thread Dean De Leo via lldb-dev
Hi, it turned out to be due to a local change in my repository, where I've forced Process::CanJIT() to be always evaluated, to track down a different unrelated issue, instead of using m_can_jit. Restoring the original semantic resolved my issue. I can now imagine that CanJIT() interfered with th