Hi,

it turned out to be due to a local change in my repository, where I've forced Process::CanJIT() to be always evaluated, to track down a different unrelated issue, instead of using m_can_jit. Restoring the original semantic resolved my issue. I can now imagine that CanJIT() interfered with the memory already allocated in the device.
I am sorry for this oversight :/

Thanks,
Dean


On 16/12/15 19:29, Tamas Berghammer wrote:
I verified and LLDB also works correctly in case of arm and aarch64 on android 
(using lldb-server). My guess is that it is a MIPS specific but in the SysV ABI 
but I haven't verified it.

Tamas

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 6:37 PM Greg Clayton via lldb-dev <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org 
<mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote:


     > On Dec 16, 2015, at 6:06 AM, Dean De Leo via lldb-dev <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org 
<mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
     >
     > Hi,
     >
     > assume we wish to use the expression evaluator to invoke a function from 
lldb, setting the result into an array passed as parameter, e.g:
     >
     > void test1(uint32_t* d) {
     >    for(int i = 0; i < 6; i++){
     >        d[i] = 42 + i;
     >    }
     > }
     >
     > where the expected output should be d = {42,43,44,45,46,47}. However 
performing the following expression having as target android/mips32 returns:
     >
     > (lldb) expr -- uint32_t data[6] = {}; test1(data);  data
     > (uint32_t [6]) $4 = ([0] = 0, [1] = 2003456944, [2] = 44, [3] = 45, [4] 
= 2004491136, [5] = 47)
     >
     > Is this an expected behaviour or a bug?

    Definitely a bug in LLDB somewhere, or possibly in the memory allocation on 
the MIPS host that is done via lldb-server. Are you using lldb-server here? It 
has an allocate memory packet.

     > I suspect the evaluator allocates the memory for data and releases once 
the expression has been executed?

    We allocate memory for the resulting data that continues to exist in your 
process so the memory shouldn't be released.

     > If so, can you please advise what's the proper way to achieve the same 
functionality?

    This should work so it will be a matter of tracking down what is actually 
failing. If you can run to where you want to run your expression and then 
before you run your expression do:

    (lldb) log enable -f /tmp/log.txt gdb-remote packets
    (lldb) log enable -f /tmp/log.txt lldb expr

    Then run your expression and then do:

    (lldb) log disable gdb-remote packets
    (lldb) log disable lldb expr

    Then send the file, we might be able to see what is going on. The GDB remote packets 
will allow us to see the memory that is allocated, and the "lldb expr" will 
allow us to see all of the gory
    details as to where it is trying to use "d".
    _______________________________________________
    lldb-dev mailing list
    lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>
    http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Reply via email to