grimar closed this revision.
grimar added a comment.
Committed as https://reviews.llvm.org/rLLDB346848.
The commit message has a wrong review link by mistake.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52403
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
grimar added a comment.
Thanks for the review! It still depends on -gsingle-file-split-dwarf
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D52403), I'll wait for it some time.
It should be possible to rewrite the comment in the test case to avoid
mentioning the flag, but I would prefer to use it.
https://reviews.
clayborg accepted this revision.
clayborg added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Looks good!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52403
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
grimar updated this revision to Diff 167440.
grimar marked an inline comment as done.
grimar added a comment.
- Addressed review comments.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52403
Files:
include/lldb/lldb-enumerations.h
lit/Breakpoint/Inputs/single-file-split-dwarf.o.yaml
lit/Breakpoint/Inputs/sin
grimar added inline comments.
Comment at: include/lldb/lldb-enumerations.h:643-660
+ eSectionTypeDWARFDebugAbbrevDwo,
eSectionTypeDWARFDebugAddr,
eSectionTypeDWARFDebugAranges,
eSectionTypeDWARFDebugCuIndex,
eSectionTypeDWARFDebugFrame,
eSectionTypeDWARFDebugInfo,
clayborg requested changes to this revision.
clayborg added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Just a few fixes. Looking good.
Comment at: include/lldb/lldb-enumerations.h:643-660
+ eSectionTypeDWARFDebugAbbrevDwo,
eSectionTypeDWARFDebugAddr,
eSect
grimar updated this revision to Diff 167287.
grimar added a comment.
Herald added subscribers: arichardson, emaste.
Herald added a reviewer: espindola.
- Addressed review comments.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52403
Files:
include/lldb/lldb-enumerations.h
lit/Breakpoint/Inputs/single-file-spli
grimar added a comment.
Thanks for all the comments!
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52403#1243127, @clayborg wrote:
> So the main questions is: do we need a new section enum called
> eSectionTypeDWARFDebugInfoDWO? If so, then this patch changes. I think I
> would prefer adding a new enum.
Yeah
clayborg added a comment.
So the main questions is: do we need a new section enum called
eSectionTypeDWARFDebugInfoDWO? If so, then this patch changes. I think I would
prefer adding a new enum.
Comment at: source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARFDwo.cpp:68
-if (aut
labath added a comment.
I believe you should be able to use `lldb-test` to write this kind of a test. I
am thinking of a sequence like:
yaml2obj %p/Inputs/test.yaml > %t/test.yaml
yaml2obj %p/Inputs/test.o.yaml > %t/test.o.yaml
lldb-test breakpoint %t/test.yaml %s | FileCheck %s
b main
grimar created this revision.
grimar added reviewers: LLDB, clayborg, aprantl, dblaikie, probinson.
Herald added a subscriber: JDevlieghere.
DWARF5 spec describes single file split dwarf case (when .dwo sections are in
the .o files).
Problem is that LLDB does not work correctly in that case. The
11 matches
Mail list logo