Author: jmolenda
Date: Thu Sep 6 18:28:48 2018
New Revision: 341623
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=341623&view=rev
Log:
Enable the fp-armv8 disassembler feature when disassembling Cortex-M
code. This will enable disassembly of the optional subset of
neon that some Cortex cores supp
xbolva00 added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51615#1226500, @stella.stamenova wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51615#1226494, @xbolva00 wrote:
>
> > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51615#1226445, @stella.stamenova wrote:
> >
> > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51615#1226396, @xbolva00
stella.stamenova added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51615#1226494, @xbolva00 wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51615#1226445, @stella.stamenova wrote:
>
> > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51615#1226396, @xbolva00 wrote:
> >
> > > Bot sure how to fix tests since this is somehow hard t
xbolva00 added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51615#1226445, @stella.stamenova wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51615#1226396, @xbolva00 wrote:
>
> > Bot sure how to fix tests since this is somehow hard to problematic.
>
>
> I think the fix for this is simply to not make the call to
stella.stamenova added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51615#1226396, @xbolva00 wrote:
> Bot sure how to fix tests since this is somehow hard to problematic.
I think the fix for this is simply to not make the call to SetUseColor here. Is
there a reason for the call? It looks like the c
Cool. The argument about reverting still stands though (you might
consider following up with logs et simila to make debugging easier).
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 2:10 PM Stella Stamenova via Phabricator
wrote:
>
> stella.stamenova added a comment.
>
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51615#1226386, @david
stella.stamenova added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51615#1226386, @davide wrote:
> You can probably revert it. BTW, is the bot public? I would like to
> understand whether I broke something after I commit.
>
> - Davide
It's not public (yet) because there's one more failure in the L
xbolva00 added a comment.
Bot sure how to fix tests since this is somehow hard to problematic.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51615
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
You can probably revert it. BTW, is the bot public? I would like to
understand whether I broke something after I commit.
--
Davide
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:21 AM Stella Stamenova via Phabricator via
lldb-commits wrote:
>
> stella.stamenova added a comment.
>
> This change causes one of the LLDB
stella.stamenova added a comment.
This change causes one of the LLDB tests to fail on Windows. More specifically:
FAIL: lldb :: Settings/TestDisableColor.test (42646 of 43956)
TEST 'lldb :: Settings/TestDisableColor.test' FAILED
***
Yeah, and we might as well refactor this function. I fell for the same
trap as Dávid when I touched this code for the first time. It's just
unexpected that a getter is doing important work... I'll prepare a
patch.
- Raphael
Am Do., 6. Sep. 2018 um 16:05 Uhr schrieb Greg Clayton :
>
> Might be a go
clayborg added a comment.
Can we add a test for this?
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51730
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Might be a good idea to add a comment in the code for this explaining the
desired side effects?
> On Sep 6, 2018, at 3:24 AM, Raphael Isemann via lldb-commits
> wrote:
>
> Author: teemperor
> Date: Thu Sep 6 03:24:11 2018
> New Revision: 341535
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?r
JDevlieghere created this revision.
JDevlieghere added reviewers: aprantl, jingham, clayborg.
JDevlieghere added a project: LLDB.
After landing https://reviews.llvm.org/rL341457, we started seeing a failure on
the swift-lldb bots. The change was correct and pretty straightforward, a
`DW_OP_const
Author: teemperor
Date: Thu Sep 6 03:24:11 2018
New Revision: 341535
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=341535&view=rev
Log:
Reland [ClangUserExpression][NFC] Removed unused code
The GetLanguageForExpr has side effects, so we can't remove this
call without breaking the completion mecha
Author: teemperor
Date: Thu Sep 6 02:42:44 2018
New Revision: 341532
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=341532&view=rev
Log:
Revert "[ClangUserExpression][NFC] Removed unused code"
GetLanguageForExpr has side effects, so this actually breaks
the completion. Should fix TestExprCompletio
16 matches
Mail list logo