RN.
> >
> >That said, I am not sure why we need this whole patch set in the first place.
>
> Well, what currently happens when you remove a device that is a
> provider of a gpio_chip which is still in use, is that the kernel
> crashes. Probably with a rather cryptic
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 04:14:53PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Commit 959e85f7, "i2c: add OF-style registration and binding" caused a
> module dependency loop where of_i2c.c calls functions in i2c-core, and
> i2c-core calls of_i2c_register_devices() in of_i2c. This means that
> when i2c support i
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 04:14:53PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Commit 959e85f7, "i2c: add OF-style registration and binding" caused a
> module dependency loop where of_i2c.c calls functions in i2c-core, and
> i2c-core calls of_i2c_register_devices() in of_i2c. This means that
> when i2c support i
si107, MPC512x, MPC52xx,
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Ben Dooks,
say yes to this option, support will be included for the
> built-in I2C interface on the MPC107, Tsi107, MPC512x, MPC52xx,
> --
> 1.7.2.3
>
--
Ben Dooks, b...@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/ben/
Large Hadron Colada: A large Pina Colada that makes the universe disappe
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 04:09:57PM +0100, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> Ben Dooks said the following:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Esben Haabendal
> >> wrote:
> >> > This fixes MAL (
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:21:04AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
>
> > To the best of my knowledge i2c-mpc falls into the "embedded platforms"
> > category and is thus under Ben's responsibility.
>
> I don't see his Signed-off-by on any patch to i2c-mpc.c for the past
> three yea
to allow the
> I2C operation to finish, because unacknowledged I2C operations can cause the
> I2C bus to hang.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi
Acked-by: Ben Dooks
> ---
>
> A similar change should probably be done to i2c-cpm.c, and maybe all other
> I2C drivers. Not many u
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 05:46:30PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the comments on the previous version, here comes another
> RFC...
>
> Changes since the second RFC:
> - Addressed all comments that were raised by Pierre Ossman.
> There were too many to mention them all,
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 05:05:04PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:33:08 +0300
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> > From: Ben Dooks
> >
> > The Samsung SDHCI (and FSL eSDHC) controller block seems to fail
> > to generate an INT_DATA_END aft
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:11:51AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Mark Ware wrote:
>
> >Recent DMA changes result in a BUG() when NULL is passed to
> >dma_alloc_coherent in place of a device.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Mark Ware
> >---
> >
> >This patch fixes the BUG() duri
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:58:31PM +1100, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> We currently have 21 definitions of struct clk in the ARM architecture,
> each defined on a per-platform basis. This makes it difficult to define
> platform- (or architecture-) independent clock sources without making
> assumptions abou
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:01:49AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:48:44AM +0100, Francesco VIRLINZI wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy
> > In November I already sent a proposal on
> > a generic linux clk framework.
> > On that I would suggest:
> >
> >>
> >> +struct clk {
> >
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:01:49AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:48:44AM +0100, Francesco VIRLINZI wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy
> > In November I already sent a proposal on
> > a generic linux clk framework.
> > On that I would suggest:
> >
> >>
> >> +struct clk {
> >
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:17:55PM +0100, Albrecht Dreà wrote:
> Improve the recovery of the MPC5200B's I2C bus from errors like bus
> hangs.
This is very sparse comapred to the large comment below the --- line,
maybe some more description should be living up here.
Is thios a candidate for an -r
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 04:15:09PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > >>
> > >> -static void __devinit mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx(struct device_node *node,
> > >> -struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
> > >> -u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:55:04PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> From: Wolfgang Grandegger
>
> "__devinit[data]" has not yet been used for all initialization functions
> and data. To avoid truncating lines, the struct mpc_i2c_match_data has
> been renamed to mpc_i2c_data, which is even the
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 07:44:10PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Ben Dooks wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:55:04PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> >> From: Wolfgang Grandegger
> >>
> >> "__devinit[data]" has not yet been used for
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:06:50AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> .node is being removed
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
> ---
>
> sound/soc/fsl/mpc8610_hpcd.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc8610_hpcd.c b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc8610_hpcd
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 11:36:57PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 20:45 -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> >
> >> Either fought or embraced. To the extent that it is possible to focus
> >> solely on Linux and ARM,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:43:14AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Apr 22, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Ben Dooks wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:11:51AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 21, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Mark Ware wrote:
>>>
>>>> Recen
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:28:50PM +1000, Mark Ware wrote:
> Ben Dooks wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:43:14AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> On Apr 22, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Ben Dooks wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:11:51AM -0500, Kumar Gala w
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Esben Haabendal
> wrote:
> > This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by illegal use of
> > RSTA (repeated START) after STOP condition generated after last byte
> > of reads. With this patch, i
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:15:22PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> >>> This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by
is there a new version of this patch available?
--
Ben (b...@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:04:57PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> With this patch spi drivers can use standard spi_driver.id_table and
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() mechanisms to bind against the devices. Just
> like we do with I2C drivers.
>
> This is useful when a single driver supports several varia
Use the new HAVE_PATA_PLATFORM to select PATA_PLATFORM
driver.
CC: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.24-git12-pata2/arch/ppc/Kconfig
===
--- linux-2.6.24-git12-pata2.orig/ar
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 01:12:39PM -0600, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 04:21:36PM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > Use the new HAVE_PATA_PLATFORM to select PATA_PLATFORM
> > driver.
> >
> > CC: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks &
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:53:45PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I'm getting the following badness with top of tree on a embedded
> PowerPC w/a ULI 1575 bridge (M5229 IDE):
>
> 02:1f.0 IDE interface: Acer Laboratories Inc. [ALi] M5229 IDE (rev c8)
>
> If you need more info let me know.
>
> - k
>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:58:05PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I figured out the issue. Its related to the interrupt routing being
> conveyed to the code from the device tree. We have a missing 'space'
> causing issues.
out of interest, is the M5229 attached to a single IRQ in this device
or
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 07:19:13PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> When no irq specified, pata_of_platform fills irq_res with -1,
> which is wrong to do for two reasons:
>
> 1. By definition, 'no irq' should be IRQ 0, not some negative integer;
interesting, IRQ 0 is actually valid on some ARM sy
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:03:54PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On MPC8349E-mITX, MPC8315E-RDB and MPC837x-RDB boards there is a
> Freescale MC9S08QG8 (MCU) chip with the custom firmware
> pre-programmed. The chip is used to power-off the board by the
> software, and to control some GPIO pins.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 05:29:25PM -0700, Mike Ditto wrote:
> Make the driver report an ENXIO error immediately upon NAK instead of
> waiting for another interrupt and getting a timeout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Ditto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> When reading from a device that is not present or dec
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:55:06PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> > Mike Ditto (1):
> > i2c-cpm: Detect and report NAK right away instead of timing out
>
> Could you also have a look at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/7452/ ?
> (Discussion at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patc
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 02:56:05AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 07:37:00AM +0800, Liu Dave wrote:
> > > This patch adds support for the Freescale Enhanced Secure Digital
> > > Host Controller Interface as found in some Freescale PowerPC
> > > microprocessors (e.g. MPC837x
better
than an #ifdef here?
}
void flush_thread(void)
--
2.25.1
--
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius
https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html
blessed version of gcc. These often lag years behind the recent
gcc releases :(
--
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius
https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html
On 25/07/2022 20:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 20:55:09 +0100 Ben Dooks wrote:
The setup_profiling_timer() is mostly un-implemented by many
architectures. In many places it isn't guarded by CONFIG_PROFILE
which is needed for it to be used. Make it a weak symbol in
k
38 matches
Mail list logo
