On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:01:49AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:48:44AM +0100, Francesco VIRLINZI wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy
> > In November I already sent a proposal on
> > a generic linux clk framework.
> > On that I would suggest:
> >
> >>
> >> +struct clk {
> >> + const struct clk_operations *ops;
> >>
> > spinlock_t lock;
> > const char *name;
> > int id;
>
> Name and ID are totally pointless, unless you insist on using the clk
> API in the wrong way (like S3C does.)
I assume by this you mean that a number of the s3c drives use clk_get with
their platform device and a name? if so, I agree this needs to get sorted
out.
--
Ben
Q: What's a light-year?
A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
