On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 04:15:09PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > >>
> > >> -static void __devinit mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx(struct device_node *node,
> > >> - struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
> > >> - u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
> > >> +static void __devinit mpc_i2c_setup_52xx(struct device_node *node,
> > >> + struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
> > >> + u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
> > >> {
> > >> int ret, fdr;
> > >>
> > >> + if (clock == -1) {
> > >
> > > Could we use 0 for 'no_clock'? This would make the above statement simply
> >
> > "0" is already used to maintain backward compatibility setting a safe
> > divider.
>
> Ah, now I see:
>
> 'clock == -1' means 'preserve clocks' (and is checked here in
> mpc_i2c_setup_52xx())
> 'clock == 0' means 'safe divider' (and is checked in mpc_i2c_get_fdr_52xx())
hmm, sounds like a job for a #define or similar.
> This is not a beauty ;)
>
> What about adding a flags variable to the setup-functions?
>
> Regards,
>
> Wolfram
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
Ben (b...@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
