RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc/fsl_pci: Add MPC83xx PCI-E controller RCmode support

2009-01-05 Thread Liu Dave
> +static void __iomem *mpc83xx_pcie_remap_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus, > + unsigned int devfn, int offset) > +{ > + struct pci_controller *hose = bus->sysdata; > + struct mpc83xx_pcie *pcie = hose->dn->data; > + u8 bus_no = bus->number - hose->first_busno; >

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc/fsl_pci: Add MPC83xx PCI-E controller RCmode support

2009-01-05 Thread Arun Kumar
kindly unsubscribe me from this mailing list. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

UNSUBSCRIBE

2009-01-05 Thread Arun Kumar
> > kindly unsubscribe me from this mailing list. > -- Best Regards, Arun " Not in imagined futures Or in remembered pasts But only here and only now Will you find a peace that lasts" ___ Linuxp

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Copy bootable images in the default install script

2009-01-05 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:57:20PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: >From: Grant Likely > >This patch makes the default install script (arch/powerpc/boot/install.sh) >copy the bootable image files into the install directory. Before this >patch only the vmlinux image file was copied. What do you do for

[PATCH v4 0/2] MPC83xx PCI-E support

2009-01-05 Thread Anton Vorontsov
Hi all, Thanks for the comments on the previous versions, and here is the updated patch set to support PCI-E on MPC83xx boards. Changes since v3: - TAL register programming changed per new reference manual for 83xx processors; - dts files no longer specify config window in regs = <>. Instead, P

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc/fsl_pci: Add MPC83xx PCI-E controller RCmode support

2009-01-05 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:18:26PM +0800, Liu Dave wrote: > > +static void __iomem *mpc83xx_pcie_remap_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus, > > + unsigned int devfn, int offset) > > +{ > > + struct pci_controller *hose = bus->sysdata; > > + struct mpc83xx_pcie *pcie = hose->dn

[PATCH 1/2] powerpc/fsl_pci: Add MPC83xx PCI-E controller RC mode support

2009-01-05 Thread Anton Vorontsov
This patch adds support for PCI-Express controllers as found on the newer MPC83xx chips. The work is loosely based on the Tony Li's patch[1], but unlike the original patch, this patch implements sliding window for the Type 1 transactions using outbound window translations, so we don't have to iore

[PATCH 2/2] powerpc/83xx: Add PCI-E support for all MPC83xx boards with PCI-E

2009-01-05 Thread Anton Vorontsov
This patch adds pcie nodes to the appropriate dts files, plus adds some probing code for the boards. Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8315erdb.dts | 64 + arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8377_mds.dts | 64 +

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/83xx: Add PCI-E support for all MPC83xx boards with PCI-E

2009-01-05 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 08:26:14AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > I meant the official u-boot from denx.de vs the one FSL ships w/its > boards & BSPs. The BSP u-boot has modifications that don't exist in > the denx.de u-boot (as the quality of the code is not up to open > source standards). I b

plz unsubscribe

2009-01-05 Thread nagaraju goruganti
plz unsubscribe me -- Regards Nagaraju G ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

The usage of compatible 'simple-bus'

2009-01-05 Thread Li Yang
Hi all, I got an assumption from the existing device trees that having 'simple-bus' in the compatible property of a node means that all child nodes should be added as of_platform_device in platform initialization phase. No matter it represents a bus in common sense or not. Is this truly the c

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Copy bootable images in the default install script

2009-01-05 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:57:20PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > >From: Grant Likely > > > >This patch makes the default install script (arch/powerpc/boot/install.sh) > >copy the bootable image files into the install directory. Before this > >

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/83xx: Add PCI-E support for all MPC83xx boards with PCI-E

2009-01-05 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:46:45AM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: [...] > > My statement was to convey that the kernel.org kernel should only > > worry itself with the denx.de u-boot (w/regards to compatibility). > > Why? Unless the BSP u-boots do something insane, I think we should try > to have the

[PATCH] powerpc: use common cpu_die

2009-01-05 Thread Milton Miller
Configuring a powerpc 32 bit kernel for both SMP and SUSPEND turns on CPU_HOTPLUG to enable disable_nonboot_cpus to be called by the common suspend code. Previously the definition of cpu_die for ppc32 was in the powermac platform code, causing it to be undefined if that platform as not selected.

[PATCH] powerpc/8313erdb: fix kernel crash

2009-01-05 Thread Li Yang
Probe the new mdio node added by b31a1d8b. Fix kernel panic problem when gianfar driver wants to get the of_platform_device of that mdio. Signed-off-by: Li Yang --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/

Re: [PATCH v5] spi: Add PPC4xx SPI driver

2009-01-05 Thread Stefan Roese
On Saturday 27 December 2008, David Brownell wrote: > On Tuesday 25 November 2008, Stefan Roese wrote: > > Changes in v5: > > - Don't call setupxfer() from setup() so that the baudrate etc > > won't get changed while another transfer is active, as suggested > > by David Brownell. > > Better, bu

unsubscribe

2009-01-05 Thread Leonid
Please unsubscribe me from this list. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/fsl-booke: declare tlbcam_index for use in c file

2009-01-05 Thread Kumar Gala
I'll pick this up, but wondering about this patch vs Trent's changes to remove this. How is KVM on fsl-booke using this value? - k On Jan 4, 2009, at 12:57 AM, Liu Yu wrote: Hi Kumar, Can I get your ack? So that I can submit this patch through KVM tree. -Original Message- From:

Re: Lock-up on PPC64

2009-01-05 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Sunday 28 December 2008, malc wrote: > Now to the Christmas cheer, i've tried v2.6.28 and couldn't help but > notice that the problem is gone, bisecting v2.6.27 (which funnily i > had to mark good) to v2.6.28 (which has to be marked bad) wasn't fun > but eventually converged at ab598b6680f1e74c2

Re: 2.6.28-rc9 panics with crashkernel=256M while booting

2009-01-05 Thread Dave Hansen
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 19:19 +0530, Chandru wrote: > On Tuesday 30 December 2008 03:06:07 Dave Hansen wrote: > When booted with crashkernel=2...@32m or any memory size less than > this, the system boots properly. The system comes up with two nodes > (0-256M and 256M-4GB). The crashkernel memory rese

unsubscribe

2009-01-05 Thread Nitesh Guinde
___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: Lock-up on PPC64

2009-01-05 Thread malc
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Michael Ellerman wrote: On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 03:45 +0300, malc wrote: On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 03:08 +0300, m...@pulsesoft.com wrote: Ken Moffat writes: On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 06:04:45AM +0300, m...@pulsesoft.com wrote:

Re: [PATCH] 2.6.28-git4 - powerpc - drivers build fails with !CONFIG_VIOPATH

2009-01-05 Thread Milton Miller
On Jan 4, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: Hi Milton, Thanks for the review comments, I am resending the patch with the changes you have recommended. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal Better, but you didn't include the change log, nor did you respond to Stephen's reply sugg

Re: The usage of compatible 'simple-bus'

2009-01-05 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 06:27:39PM +0800, Li Yang wrote: > I got an assumption from the existing device trees that having > 'simple-bus' in the compatible property of a node means that all child > nodes should be added as of_platform_device in platform initialization > phase. No matter it represen

Re: 2.6.28 does not boot on MPC8315E-RDB, or...?

2009-01-05 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 01:45:15AM +0100, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Steve DeLaney wrote: > > > > we are booting 2.6.26 on MPC8349-MITXE > > do you need a device tree? this can be tftp loaded, or flashed in the board > > and > > cp.b from flash to ram be

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/8313erdb: fix kernel crash

2009-01-05 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:25:08AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jan 5, 2009, at 4:47 AM, Li Yang wrote: > > >Probe the new mdio node added by b31a1d8b. Fix kernel panic problem > >when > >gianfar driver wants to get the of_platform_device of that mdio. > > > >Signed-off-by: Li Yang > >---

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/83xx: Add PCI-E support for all MPC83xx boards with PCI-E

2009-01-05 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 08:29:39AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: [...] >> +compatible = "fsl,mpc8315-pcie", "fsl,mpc8314-pcie"; >> +reg = <0xe0009000 0x1000 0xb000 0x0100>; > > the size on the 0xb000 seems wrong This is how FSL U-

Re: [PATCH v5] spi: Add PPC4xx SPI driver

2009-01-05 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stefan, In message <200901051912.25874...@denx.de> you wrote: > > > > + /* Write new configration */ > > > + out_8(&hw->regs->mode, cs->mode); > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * Allow platform reduce the interrupt load on the CPU during SPI > > > + * transfers. We do not target maximum performanc

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Copy bootable images in the default install script

2009-01-05 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 08:28:56AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: >>On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:57:20PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: >>> >From: Grant Likely >>> > >>> >This patch makes the defa

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/8313erdb: fix kernel crash

2009-01-05 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 5, 2009, at 4:47 AM, Li Yang wrote: Probe the new mdio node added by b31a1d8b. Fix kernel panic problem when gianfar driver wants to get the of_platform_device of that mdio. Signed-off-by: Li Yang --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+),

AW: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support

2009-01-05 Thread Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik)
> Hans, what ATA modes do you see this problem in? UDMA? MWDMA? Or does just > having the patch applied but still using PIO mode expose the problem? This problem occurs in MWDMA 2 mode. Happy new year Mit freundlichen Grüßen Hans Lehmann Softwareentwicklung Telefon +49 (0)2191-67-2520

Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support

2009-01-05 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) wrote: >> Hans, what ATA modes do you see this problem in? UDMA? MWDMA? Or does >> just having the patch applied but still using PIO mode expose the problem? > > > This problem occurs in MWDMA 2 mode. Thanks Hans. DMA support

Re: 2.6.28-rc9 panics with crashkernel=256M while booting

2009-01-05 Thread Chandru
On Tuesday 30 December 2008 03:06:07 Dave Hansen wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 11:59 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > > + } > > > + > > > + for_each_online_node(nid) { > > > /* > > > - * Be very careful about moving this around. Future > > > - * cal

[QUESTION] 440EPx with PCI to PCIe bridge error

2009-01-05 Thread Steven A. Falco
I have a Sequoia board (440EPx) with kernel 2.6.27.9. I've recently plugged in a PLX adapter board to convert one of the PCI connectors on the Sequoia to PCIe. When the kernel boots, I get the following error messages regarding mem resource allocation. Device :00:0c.0 is the PCI<->PCIe bridg

unsubscribe

2009-01-05 Thread P Jagadeesh Maiya
___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: Lock-up on PPC64

2009-01-05 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 03:45 +0300, malc wrote: > On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 03:08 +0300, m...@pulsesoft.com wrote: > >> Ken Moffat writes: > >> > >>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 06:04:45AM +0300, m...@pulsesoft.com wrote: > > [..snip..] > > >> > >

Re: [PATCH] ppc64: Enable RELOCATABLE option for CRASH_DUMP

2009-01-05 Thread Milton Miller
Mohan wrote: config CRASH_DUMP bool "Build a kdump crash kernel" - depends on (PPC64 && RELOCATABLE) || 6xx + depends on PPC64 || 6xx + select RELOCATABLE help Build a kernel suitable for use as a kdump capture kernel. The same kernel binary

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Copy bootable images in the default install script

2009-01-05 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 08:28:56AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: >On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:57:20PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: >> >From: Grant Likely >> > >> >This patch makes the default install script (arch/powerpc/boot/install.sh) >> >copy

Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/fsl-booke: declare tlbcam_index for use in c file

2009-01-05 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 10:26 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > I'll pick this up, but wondering about this patch vs Trent's changes > to remove this. Please do not pick up this patch; if you ack it, let us push it through kvm.git. Otherwise we need to wait for it to travel from kumar.git -> benh.git ->

Re: [QUESTION] 440EPx with PCI to PCIe bridge error

2009-01-05 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 15:09 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: > I have a Sequoia board (440EPx) with kernel 2.6.27.9. I've recently > plugged in a PLX adapter board to convert one of the PCI connectors > on the Sequoia to PCIe. > > When the kernel boots, I get the following error messages regarding >

[PATCH v3] Add PPC/4xx "ibm,sdram-4xx-ddr2" EDAC MC Driver

2009-01-05 Thread Grant Erickson
This adds support for an EDAC memory controller adaptation driver for the "ibm,sdram-4xx-ddr2" ECC controller realized in the AMCC PowerPC 405EX[r]. Signed-off-by: Grant Erickson --- At present, this driver has been developed and tested against the controller realization in the AMCC PPC405EX[r] o

Re: [QUESTION] 440EPx with PCI to PCIe bridge error

2009-01-05 Thread Steven A. Falco
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 15:09 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: >> I have a Sequoia board (440EPx) with kernel 2.6.27.9. I've recently >> plugged in a PLX adapter board to convert one of the PCI connectors >> on the Sequoia to PCIe. >> >> When the kernel boots, I get the

unsubscribe

2009-01-05 Thread Jim Rose
___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

[RFC PATCH] "multifunc-device": fix IRQ assignment by also scanning dummy nodes

2009-01-05 Thread Tom Arbuckle
Kernel: 2.6.28; function: scan_OF_pci_childs; file: arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_32.c Quoting from line 206 : 'some OFs create a parent node "multifunc-device" as a fake root for all functions of a multi-function device. we go down them as well.' Function scan_OF_for_pci_dev (line 225) also needs to be

unsubscribe

2009-01-05 Thread Iain Shewring
___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: 2.6.28 does not boot on MPC8315E-RDB, or...?

2009-01-05 Thread Leon Woestenberg
Hello Anton, On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 01:45:15AM +0100, Leon Woestenberg wrote: >> Earlier release kernels booted for me, and I use the device tree >> compiled from the device tree source that comes with the tree. >> >> I used the exact same

unsubscribe

2009-01-05 Thread Nate Jozwiak
unsubscribe ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Unsubscribe

2009-01-05 Thread JeongIn Choi
Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle Hello Frank Would you please unsubscribe me ? regard yours                         Jeong In. ChoiSamsung Thales Co.,Ltd. S/W1 Group Advanced Technology R&D Center   SAMSUNG THALES CO., LTD.  Chang-Li 304, Namsa-M

Re: [PATCH] net/ehea: bitops work on unsigned longs

2009-01-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Dave, On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:51:56 -0800 (PST) David Miller wrote: > > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:18:53 +1100 > > > These changes will avoid several warnings when we change u64 to unsigned > > long long. > > > > Also, ehea_driver_flags is only used in ehca_main.c >

Re: [PATCH] net/ehea: use consistent type

2009-01-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Dave, On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:09:01 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 21:51 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > From: Stephen Rothwell > > Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:17:30 +1100 > > > > > ehea_plpar_hcall9() takes an unsigned long array, so pass that. > > > > > > This

Re: [PATCH] net/ehea: bitops work on unsigned longs

2009-01-05 Thread David Miller
From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:59:51 +1100 > Hi Dave, > > On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:51:56 -0800 (PST) David Miller > wrote: > > > > From: Stephen Rothwell > > Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:18:53 +1100 > > > > > These changes will avoid several warnings when we change u64 to unsigne

Re: [PATCH] net/ehea: bitops work on unsigned longs

2009-01-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Dave, On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:05:35 -0800 (PST) David Miller wrote: > > Aha, yes the commit message fooled me :-) New patch is fine and > I'll toss this into net-2.6 I will try to do better in the future, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au http://w

Re: [PATCH] net/ehea: use consistent type

2009-01-05 Thread David Miller
From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:05:11 +1100 > Hi Dave, > > On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:09:01 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt > wrote: > > > > Well, in that case, this patch is actually correct without considering > > the u64 change. The array is what lands in the registers of the pHyp

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: use common cpu_die

2009-01-05 Thread Matt Sealey
Milton you're amazing <3 This is going to take a while to test. I have to build a new source rpm and push it to Peter, who is doing some work and I need him to have working config the same as mine. I am build testing the patch in parallel here.. maybe I will have a kernel tonight or maybe tomo

What is with all these unsubscribe messages

2009-01-05 Thread Matt Gessner
Does anyone have a feel as to why all these messages are being sent out (other than the fact that people don't use the manager to manage their membership)? ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-

Re: yaboot: text mode or graphics mode?

2009-01-05 Thread Matt Sealey
They should be mapped into PCI address space with the rest, you should note though that a bunch of people have asked this a bunch of times and the response is usually null. If you want to output debugging info, try a serial port, or if you're still at the point in boot where the OF is still ar

Re: unsubscribe

2009-01-05 Thread Ian Juang
Please unsubscribe me from this list. Original Message Subject: unsubscribe From: Leonid To: Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Date: 2009年1月6日 上午 02:03:55 Please unsubscribe me from this list. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@oz

Re: What is with all these unsubscribe messages

2009-01-05 Thread Sean MacLennan
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:03:58 -0500 "Matt Gessner" wrote: > Does anyone have a feel as to why all these messages are being sent > out (other than the fact that people don't use the manager to manage > their membership)? I am seeing them on other forums too. I am suspicious, but do not know for sur

Re: What is with all these unsubscribe messages

2009-01-05 Thread Ben Warren
Sean MacLennan wrote: On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:03:58 -0500 "Matt Gessner" wrote: Does anyone have a feel as to why all these messages are being sent out (other than the fact that people don't use the manager to manage their membership)? I am seeing them on other forums too. I am suspici

Re: The usage of compatible 'simple-bus'

2009-01-05 Thread David Gibson
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:20:53PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 06:27:39PM +0800, Li Yang wrote: > > I got an assumption from the existing device trees that having > > 'simple-bus' in the compatible property of a node means that all child > > nodes should be added as of_platfo

Re: What is with all these unsubscribe messages

2009-01-05 Thread David Miller
From: Ben Warren Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:27:06 -0800 > I expect they're all people, like myself, that have been bumped here > from the ppc_embedded list and aren't used to all the traffic. This is why, as a policy, we never allow propagation of subscribers from old lists to new ones created at

Re: [spi-devel-general] [PATCH v5] spi: Add PPC4xx SPI driver

2009-01-05 Thread Anton Vorontsov
Hi Stefan, On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 04:48:08PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > This adds a SPI driver for the SPI controller found in the IBM/AMCC > 4xx PowerPC's. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Ocker > Acked-by: Josh Boyer > --- [...] > +static unsigned int of_num_gpios

RE: [PATCH] powerpc/8313erdb: fix kernel crash

2009-01-05 Thread Li Yang
> -Original Message- > From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org] > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 12:25 AM > To: Li Yang-R58472 > Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/8313erdb: fix kernel crash > > > On Jan 5, 2009, at 4:47 AM, Li Yang wrote: > > > Probe

Re: What is with all these unsubscribe messages

2009-01-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Dave, On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:59:35 -0800 (PST) David Miller wrote: > > This is why, as a policy, we never allow propagation of subscribers > from old lists to new ones created at vger.kernel.org > > Everyone must go through the motions of adding themselves to the new > list. > > If you allo

Re: What is with all these unsubscribe messages

2009-01-05 Thread Jeff Brower
David- > From: Ben Warren > Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:27:06 -0800 > >> I expect they're all people, like myself, that have been bumped here >> from the ppc_embedded list and aren't used to all the traffic. > > This is why, as a policy, we never allow propagation of subscribers > from old lists to

Re: What is with all these unsubscribe messages

2009-01-05 Thread Ken MacLeod
Another data point: After I got resubscribed after the list merge I tried the list manager to unsubscribe and it hasn't taken yet. I'll try again... -- Ken ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linu

Re: What is with all these unsubscribe messages

2009-01-05 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 20:28 -0600, Jeff Brower wrote: > David- > > > From: Ben Warren > > Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:27:06 -0800 > > > >> I expect they're all people, like myself, that have been bumped here > >> from the ppc_embedded list and aren't used to all the traffic. > > > > This is why, as

Re: What is with all these unsubscribe messages

2009-01-05 Thread David Miller
From: "Jeff Brower" Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:28:46 -0600 (CST) > I completely disagree. I'm glad the embedded PC list owners were > thoughtful enough to migrate me to the new list. At the very least I know that all of the folks asking to be unsubscribed would likely take my side on this one :-)

RE: [PATCH v2] powerpc/fsl-booke: declare tlbcam_index for use inc file

2009-01-05 Thread Liu Yu
> -Original Message- > From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Hollis Blanchard > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 12:52 AM > To: Gala Kumar-B11780 > Cc: Liu Yu-B13201; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; > linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Piepho Trent-B1687

Re: unsubscribe

2009-01-05 Thread vikas . soni
unsubscibe me .. thanks > unsubscribe > > > > > > ___ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@oz

[no subject]

2009-01-05 Thread yanlong wang
unsubscribe ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

[PATCH] net/ehea: use consistant type

2009-01-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
ehea_plpar_hcall9() takes an "unsigned long" array to return its results, so change the arrays we pass to it to match. This is currently only 64 bit code, so the transformation is actually a noop, but because ehea_plpar_hcall9() copies the values of registers into the array, if this was ported to

[PATCH] ibmveth: use consistent types

2009-01-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
These variables are only used with an interface that just dumps their values into registers to be passed to the hypervisor. The arguments to that interface are declared to be "unsigned long", so make these variables match. The macros are only used with these variables, so make them match as well.

RE: The usage of compatible 'simple-bus'

2009-01-05 Thread Li Yang
> -Original Message- > From: > devicetree-discuss-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs.org > [mailto:devicetree-discuss-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs. > org] On Behalf Of David Gibson > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:43 AM > To: Wood Scott-B07421 > Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Li Ya

Re: [QUESTION] 440EPx with PCI to PCIe bridge error

2009-01-05 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Here is a complete startup log, with debug turned on as you requested. > This is still against 2.6.27.9, as it will take me a little time to > build 2.6.28. Hopefully, this log will be useful in the meantime. Can you add "debug" to your kernel command line option or send the output of the "dme

Re: The usage of compatible 'simple-bus'

2009-01-05 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Li Yang wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: >> devicetree-discuss-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs.org >> [mailto:devicetree-discuss-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs. >> org] On Behalf Of David Gibson >> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:43 AM >> To:

Re: The usage of compatible 'simple-bus'

2009-01-05 Thread Li Yang
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Li Yang wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: >>> devicetree-discuss-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs.org >>> [mailto:devicetree-discuss-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs. >>> org] On Behalf Of Dav

Re: [PATCH] 2.6.28-git4 - powerpc - drivers build fails with !CONFIG_VIOPATH

2009-01-05 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
* Milton Miller [2009-01-05 07:33:32]: > On Jan 4, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > >> Hi Milton, >> >> Thanks for the review comments, I am resending the patch with the >> changes you have recommended. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal > > Better, but you didn't include the

Re: [PATCH] 2.6.28-git4 - powerpc - drivers build fails with !CONFIG_VIOPATH

2009-01-05 Thread Sam Ravnborg
> > Sorry for resending the patch before taking care of the response. > Resending > the patch with changes made to other three drivers also. > > Impact: Fix the VIOPATH dependency in the iSeries dependent drivers. > > iSeries depend drivers build fails, when CONFIG_VIOPATH is disabled. >