On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 08:26:14AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > I meant the official u-boot from denx.de vs the one FSL ships w/its > boards & BSPs. The BSP u-boot has modifications that don't exist in > the denx.de u-boot (as the quality of the code is not up to open > source standards).
I believe "upstream" is the word you're looking for. > My statement was to convey that the kernel.org kernel should only > worry itself with the denx.de u-boot (w/regards to compatibility). Why? Unless the BSP u-boots do something insane, I think we should try to have the upstream kernel boot on the u-boot that comes on the board (it's not nice to require users to reflash unnecessarily). That said, the device tree should come from u-boot, not from the kernel. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
