On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 15:16 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On 11/05/2015 03:12 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 10:48 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > 905e75c46dba5f3061049277e4eb7110beedba43:arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ads.c
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This c
On 11/05/2015 03:12 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 10:48 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
Hi,
905e75c46dba5f3061049277e4eb7110beedba43:arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ads.c
This commit seems to cause problems with PCI devices doing DMA, just
with mpc85xx ads. If you do the "fsl_ad
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 10:48 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 905e75c46dba5f3061049277e4eb7110beedba43:arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ads.c
>
>
> This commit seems to cause problems with PCI devices doing DMA, just
> with mpc85xx ads. If you do the "fsl_add_bridge()" after you setup th
Hi,
905e75c46dba5f3061049277e4eb7110beedba43:arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ads.c
This commit seems to cause problems with PCI devices doing DMA, just
with mpc85xx ads. If you do the "fsl_add_bridge()" after you setup the
ppc_md.pci_exclude_device to mpc85xx_exclude_device, then the
earl
..@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V10] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie initialization
> code
>
> > +static int __devinit fsl_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > + int ret;
> > + struct device_node *node;
> > + struct pci_controller *hose;
> +static int __devinit fsl_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct device_node *node;
> + struct pci_controller *hose;
> +
> + node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + ret = fsl_add_bridge(node, fsl_pci_primary == node);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
> - /*
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:20 AM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li Yang-R58472; Wood Scott-B07421
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V10] powerpc/fsl-p
On Aug 28, 2012, at 2:44 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
> to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
> routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
> in probe function
] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie initialization code
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 12:54 AM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li Yang-R58472; Wood Scott-B07421
> Subje
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 12:54 AM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li Yang-R58472; Wood Scott-B07421
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V10] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/p
On Aug 28, 2012, at 2:44 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
> to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
> routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
> in probe function
We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
in probe function which is architectural better. Also It's convenient for
a
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 8:16 AM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Li Yang-
> R58472; Wood Scott-B07421
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V9] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pc
On 08/23/2012 04:31 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> +static void mpc85xx_cds_pci_assign_primary(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> + struct device_node *np;
> +
> + if (fsl_pci_primary)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * MPC85xx_CDS has ISA bridge but unfortunately there is no
> +
We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
in probe function which is architectural better. Also It's convenient for
a
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:04 AM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Li Yang-
> R58472; Bradley Hughes
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V8] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pc
> R58472; Bradley Hughes
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V8] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie initialization
>> code
>>
>> Another interesting case is stxssa8555.dts, which has an i8259 node but
>> no ISA node (are there any other instances of this?). However, I can't
>
On 08/21/2012 01:09 PM, Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 22, 2012, at 1:16, "Wood Scott-B07421" wrote:
>
>> On 08/21/2012 01:49 AM, Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
>>> If there is i8259 node in the device tree, it should be suggesting
>>> that there is a PCI to ISA bridge but not explicitly described i
On Aug 22, 2012, at 1:16, "Wood Scott-B07421" wrote:
> On 08/21/2012 01:49 AM, Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
>> If there is i8259 node in the device tree, it should be suggesting
>> that there is a PCI to ISA bridge but not explicitly described in the
>> device tree. Then we need to fix the device tre
On 08/21/2012 01:49 AM, Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
> If there is i8259 node in the device tree, it should be suggesting
> that there is a PCI to ISA bridge but not explicitly described in the
> device tree. Then we need to fix the device tree to add the ISA
> nodes.
No, we need to work with existing d
> -Original Message-
> From: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 11:26 AM
> To: Wood Scott-B07421
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Li Yang-
> R58472; Bradley Hughes
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V8] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pc
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:57 AM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Bradley Hughes
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V8] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie initialization
> code
>
> On 08/2
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:04 AM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Li Yang-
> R58472; Bradley Hughes
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V8] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pc
On 08/20/2012 05:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/20/2012 05:06 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
>> @@ -842,38 +839,60 @@ void __devinit fsl_pci_init(void)
>> node = fsl_pci_primary;
>>
>> if (of_match_node(pci_ids, node))
>> -break;
>>
On 08/20/2012 05:06 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
> to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
> routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
> in probe function which
We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
in probe function which is architectural better. Also It's convenient for
a
We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
in probe function which is architectural better. Also It's convenient for
a
;> d...@lists.ozlabs.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>> On 08/10/2012 03:47 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Gala Kumar-B117
On 08/15/2012 03:57 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
> to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
> routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
> in probe function which
On Aug 14, 2012, at 10:56 PM, "Jia Hongtao-B38951" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mpc85xx_pci_err_probe);
>>
>> Make this EXPORT_SYMBOL.
>>
>
> Hi Timur and Kumar:
>
> I'm a little confused.
> Should we remove _GPL for upstream version too?
Yes.
>
> -Hongtao.
___
We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
in probe function which is architectural better. Also It's convenient for
a
t; >> Cc: Jia Hongtao-B38951; Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472; linuxppc-
> >> d...@lists.ozlabs.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
> >> initialization code
> >>
> >>>>>>>>> As I explained before,
> -Original Message-
> From: Tabi Timur-B04825
> Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 9:11 PM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Wood Scott-
> B07421
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
>
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mpc85xx_pci_err_probe);
Make this EXPORT_SYMBOL.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozl
> Yang-R58472
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>> On 08/07/2012 10:57 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Wood Scott-B07421
>
;> d...@lists.ozlabs.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>>>>>>>>> As I explained before, this has to be done globally, not from
>>>>>>>>> the probe function, so we can assig
On Aug 10, 2012, at 3:19 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
> to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
> routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
> in probe function
On Aug 10, 2012, at 3:19 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
> to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
> routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
> in probe function
> -Original Message-
> From: Gala Kumar-B11780
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:04 AM
> To: Wood Scott-B07421
> Cc: Jia Hongtao-B38951; Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472; linuxppc-
> d...@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/
We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
in probe function which is architectural better. Also It's convenient for
a
el.crashing.org; Li Yang-R58472
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>> On 08/08/2012 04:39 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Wood Scot
>> Gala Kumar-B11780
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>> On 08/08/2012 04:03 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Wood Scott-B07421
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 11:54 PM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Kumar Gala; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li
> Yang-R58472
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
t; Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
> >> ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Li Yang-R58472
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
> >> initialization code
> >>
> >> On 08/07/2012 03:09 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote
ott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li Yang-R58472;
> >> Jia
> >> Hongtao-B38951
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
> >> initialization code
> >>
> >> On 08/06/2012 11:20 PM
>>> As I explained before, this has to be done globally, not from the
>>> probe function, so we can assign a default primary bus if there
>>> isn't any ISA.
>>> There are bugs in the Linux PPC PCI code relating to not having
>>> any primary bus.
>>>
>>> -Scott
>>
>
rashing.org; Li Yang-R58472
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>> On 08/07/2012 03:09 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>>> I am really not sure that all boards need primary bus. Could you give
>>> me the
; Hongtao-B38951
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>> On 08/06/2012 11:20 PM, Li Yang wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Scott Wood
>> wrote:
>>>> On 08/05/2012 10:07 PM, Jia Hongt
Yang-R58472
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>> On 08/07/2012 01:23 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Wood Scott-B07421
>>>> Sent: Monday, Aug
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 11:29 PM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
> ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Li Yang-R58472
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fs
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 11:25 PM
> To: Li Yang-R58472
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li Yang-R58472; Jia
> Hongtao-B38951
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 11:20 PM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Kumar Gala; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li
> Yang-R58472
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
On 08/07/2012 03:09 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
> I am really not sure that all boards need primary bus. Could you give me
> the link of discussion about primary that you mentioned?
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2012-June/098586.html
-Scott
__
y, August 04, 2012 12:28 AM
>>>> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
>>>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Li Yang-
>>>> R58472; Wood Scott-B07421
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>>>> ini
R58472
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>> On 08/05/2012 09:39 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Wood Scott-B07421
>>>> Sent:
c: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Li
> >> Yang- R58472; Wood Scott-B07421
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
> >> initialization code
> >>
> >> On 08/03/2012 05:14 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 11:16 PM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Kumar Gala; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li
> Yang-R58472
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
> ini
ao-B38951
>>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Li Yang-
>>> R58472; Wood Scott-B07421
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>>> initialization code
>>>
>>> On 08/03/2012 05:14 AM, Jia Hongtao wrot
t; Yang-R58472
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>> On 08/02/2012 10:39 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Kumar Gala [mailto
;> R58472; Wood Scott-B07421
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>> On 08/03/2012 05:14 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
>>> -void __devinit fsl_pci_init(void)
>>> +/* Checkout if PCI contains ISA node *
On 08/05/2012 11:11 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> p1022ds OTOH is weird enough that it deserves its own board file.
>
> What's so weird about the P1022DS?
The localbus muxing.
> Also, why do we need a default PCI bus if one isn't specifi
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> p1022ds OTOH is weird enough that it deserves its own board file.
What's so weird about the P1022DS?
Also, why do we need a default PCI bus if one isn't specified in the
device tree?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 12:28 AM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Li Yang-
> R58472; Wood Scott-B07421
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] powerpc/fs
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 12:04 AM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: Kumar Gala; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Li
> Yang-R58472
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
On 08/03/2012 05:14 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> -void __devinit fsl_pci_init(void)
> +/* Checkout if PCI contains ISA node */
> +static int of_pci_has_isa(struct device_node *pci_node)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!pci_node)
> + return 0;
> +
>
> B07421; Li Yang-R58472
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>> Why are you eliminating the uli lookup? We don't want to call
>> uli_exclude_device on boards that don't have a uli.
>>
>&
07421; Li Yang-R58472
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>> You need to convert all boards to use fsl_pci_init before this patch.
>> Otherwise we'll end up with PCI getting initialized twice on boards.
>>
&g
We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
in probe function which is architectural better. Also It's convenient for
a
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 8:24 PM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-p
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 4:19 AM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Wood Scott-
> B07421; Li Yang-R58472
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fs
On 08/02/2012 06:42 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
> to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
> routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
> in probe function which
On 08/02/2012 07:23 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> You need to convert all boards to use fsl_pci_init before this patch.
> Otherwise we'll end up with PCI getting initialized twice on boards.
Alternatively, don't make fsl_pci_init an initcall until all boards have
been converted.
-Scott
On Aug 2, 2012, at 6:42 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
> to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
> routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
> in probe function
We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
in probe function which is architectural better. Also It's convenient for
a
>
>
> On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:30 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
>
> > We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
> > to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
> > routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
> > in
;>>
> >>>
> >>>> -Original Message-
> >>>> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
> >>>> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 5:17 AM
> >>>> To: Wood Scott-B07421
> >>>> Cc: Jia Hongtao-B3895
la [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 5:17 AM
>>>> To: Wood Scott-B07421
>>>> Cc: Jia Hongtao-B38951; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
>>>> Li Yang-R58472
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V
AM
>>> To: Wood Scott-B07421
>>> Cc: Jia Hongtao-B38951; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
>>> Li Yang-R58472
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>>> initialization code
>>>
>>>
>>>
To: Wood Scott-B07421
> >> Cc: Jia Hongtao-B38951; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-
> B07421;
> >> Li Yang-R58472
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
> >> initialization code
> >>
> >>
> >>
51
> >> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
> >> initialization code
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jul 27, 2012, at 3:35 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
> >>
ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
>> Li Yang-R58472
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/27/2012 05:10 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wr
Li Yang-R58472
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2012, at 3:35 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From:
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 5:17 AM
> To: Wood Scott-B07421
> Cc: Jia Hongtao-B38951; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
> Li Yang-R58472
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] power
Jia Hongtao-B38951
> >> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
> >> initialization code
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:30 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
&g
On Jul 27, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 05:10 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>> Hi kumar,
>>
>> I know "duplicate code from pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges()" is
>> hard to accept but "refactor the code to have a shared function"
>> is knotty. Actually this is the reason I did
On 07/27/2012 05:10 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
> Hi kumar,
>
> I know "duplicate code from pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges()" is
> hard to accept but "refactor the code to have a shared function"
> is knotty. Actually this is the reason I didn't do the refactor.
Maybe we should keep doing the ini
tt-B07421; Li Yang-R58472
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>>
>> On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:30 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
>>
>>> We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the
>> fs
iginal Message-
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 1:53 AM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
> initializ
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 2:15 AM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pci
On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:30 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
> to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
> routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
> in probe function
On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:30 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
> to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
> routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
> in probe function
We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
routine is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done
in probe function which is architectural better. Also It's convenient for
a
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Wood
> Scott-
> >> B07421; Li Yang-R58472
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
> initialization
> >> code
> >>
> >> On 07/24/2012 05:20 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> >
1; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
> ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Li Yang-R58472
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie initialization
> code
>
> On 07/24/2012 09:35 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> &g
> B07421; Li Yang-R58472
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie initialization
>> code
>>
>> On 07/24/2012 05:20 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
>>> We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the
>> fsl_pci
>>> to
We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
to a platform driver. In previous PCI code architecture the initialization
is called at board_setup_arch stage. Now the initialization is done in
probe function which is architectural better. Also It's convenient for
adding PM
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:43 AM
> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Wood Scott-
> B07421; Li Yang-R58472
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pc
On 07/24/2012 05:20 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
> We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
> to a platform driver.
>
> In previous version pci/pcie initialization is in platform code which
> Initialize pci bridge base on EP/RC or host/agent settings.
The previous versio
We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
to a platform driver.
In previous version pci/pcie initialization is in platform code which
Initialize pci bridge base on EP/RC or host/agent settings.
Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao
Signed-off-by: Li Yang
---
arch/powerpc/sy
We unified the Freescale pci/pcie initialization by changing the fsl_pci
to a platform driver.
In previous version pci/pcie initialization is in platform code which
Initialize pci bridge base on EP/RC or host/agent settings.
Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao
Signed-off-by: Li Yang
---
arch/powerpc/sy
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
