Re: p1020 unstable with 3.2

2012-01-02 Thread Alexander Graf
On 28.12.2011, at 06:01, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 11:48 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 24.12.2011, at 07:53, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 17:54 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: Hi guys, While trying to test my latest patc

Re: p1020 unstable with 3.2

2011-12-27 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 11:48 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 24.12.2011, at 07:53, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 17:54 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> While trying to test my latest patch queue for ppc kvm, I realized > >> that even though the dev

Re: p1020 unstable with 3.2

2011-12-25 Thread Alexander Graf
On 24.12.2011, at 07:53, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 17:54 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> While trying to test my latest patch queue for ppc kvm, I realized >> that even though the device trees got updated, the p1020 box still is >> unstable. The trace b

Re: p1020 unstable with 3.2

2011-12-23 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 17:54 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > Hi guys, > > While trying to test my latest patch queue for ppc kvm, I realized > that even though the device trees got updated, the p1020 box still is > unstable. The trace below is the one I've seen the most. It only > occurs during netw

p1020 unstable with 3.2

2011-12-23 Thread Alexander Graf
Hi guys, While trying to test my latest patch queue for ppc kvm, I realized that even though the device trees got updated, the p1020 box still is unstable. The trace below is the one I've seen the most. It only occurs during network I/O which happens a lot on that box, since I'm running it usin