On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 11:48 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 24.12.2011, at 07:53, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 17:54 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> While trying to test my latest patch queue for ppc kvm, I realized > >> that even though the device trees got updated, the p1020 box still is > >> unstable. The trace below is the one I've seen the most. It only > >> occurs during network I/O which happens a lot on that box, since I'm > >> running it using NFS root. > >> > >> As for configuration, I use kumar's "merge" branch from today and the > >> p1020rdb.dts device tree provided in that tree. > >> > >> The last known good configuration I'm aware of is 3.0. > >> > >> Any ideas what's going wrong here? > > > > Try SLAB instead of SLUB and let me know. It -could- be a bogon in SLUB > > that should be fixed upstream now but I think did hit 3.2 > > Yup, things seem a lot more stable with SLAB now :).
BTW. Fix for slub should be upstream: 42d623a8cd08eb93ab221d22cee5a62618895bbf Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
