On 28.12.2011, at 06:01, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 11:48 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 24.12.2011, at 07:53, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 17:54 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> While trying to test my latest patch queue for ppc kvm, I realized >>>> that even though the device trees got updated, the p1020 box still is >>>> unstable. The trace below is the one I've seen the most. It only >>>> occurs during network I/O which happens a lot on that box, since I'm >>>> running it using NFS root. >>>> >>>> As for configuration, I use kumar's "merge" branch from today and the >>>> p1020rdb.dts device tree provided in that tree. >>>> >>>> The last known good configuration I'm aware of is 3.0. >>>> >>>> Any ideas what's going wrong here? >>> >>> Try SLAB instead of SLUB and let me know. It -could- be a bogon in SLUB >>> that should be fixed upstream now but I think did hit 3.2 >> >> Yup, things seem a lot more stable with SLAB now :). > > BTW. Fix for slub should be upstream: > > 42d623a8cd08eb93ab221d22cee5a62618895bbf
Yup, works like a charm now again. Thanks a lot! Alex _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
