On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:57:26AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 07:49 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> It's something like the followings. For ER on PE#0, we will have
>> PE with type of EEH_PE_BUS marked as isolated, instead of the
>> one with EEH_PE_PHB.
>>
>>
>>
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 07:49 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> It's something like the followings. For ER on PE#0, we will have
> PE with type of EEH_PE_BUS marked as isolated, instead of the
> one with EEH_PE_PHB.
>
>
> [ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB]
>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:56:06PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 18:00 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> + pci_regs_buf[0] = 0;
>> + eeh_pe_for_each_dev(pe, edev) {
>> + loglen += eeh_gather_pci_data(edev, pci_regs_buf,
>> +
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:55:15PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 18:00 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> + /*
>> +* When the PHB is fenced or dead, it's pointless to collect
>> +* the data from PCI config space because it should return
>> +* 0xF
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 18:00 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> + pci_regs_buf[0] = 0;
> + eeh_pe_for_each_dev(pe, edev) {
> + loglen += eeh_gather_pci_data(edev, pci_regs_buf,
> + EEH_PCI_REGS_LOG_LEN);
>
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 18:00 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> + /*
> +* When the PHB is fenced or dead, it's pointless to collect
> +* the data from PCI config space because it should return
> +* 0xFF's. For ER, we still retrieve the data from the PCI
> +* config spac
