On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:57:26AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 07:49 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote: >> It's something like the followings. For ER on PE#0, we will have >> PE with type of EEH_PE_BUS marked as isolated, instead of the >> one with EEH_PE_PHB. >> >> >> [ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB] >> | >> [ EEH_PE_BUS ] PE#0 >> | > >So we actually have two PEs here ? One real (PE#0) and one imaginary >(PHB PE) with no PE# associated ? >
Yes, The (PHB PE) is actually a container to all PEs under the PHB ;-) >> ------------------------- >> | | >> [ EEH_PE_BUS ] PE#1 [ EEH_PE_BUS] PE#2 >> >> >I would either not bother and collect the FF's, or make this specific >> >to fence and only fence. >> > >> >> I'd like to keep it specific to fenced PHB and it's already be >> that :-) Thanks, Gavin _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
