On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 07:49 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote: > It's something like the followings. For ER on PE#0, we will have > PE with type of EEH_PE_BUS marked as isolated, instead of the > one with EEH_PE_PHB. > > > [ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB] > | > [ EEH_PE_BUS ] PE#0 > |
So we actually have two PEs here ? One real (PE#0) and one imaginary (PHB PE) with no PE# associated ? > ------------------------- > | | > [ EEH_PE_BUS ] PE#1 [ EEH_PE_BUS] PE#2 > > >I would either not bother and collect the FF's, or make this specific > >to fence and only fence. > > > > I'd like to keep it specific to fenced PHB and it's already be > that :-) Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev