Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 20:57 -0500, Valentine Barshak wrote:
>
>> +static int m88e_init(struct mii_phy *phy)
>> +{
>> +printk("%s: Marvell 88E Ethernet\n", __FUNCTION__);
>> +phy_write(phy, 0x14, 0x0ce3);
>> +phy_write(phy, 0x18, 0x4101);
>> +
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 20:57 -0500, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> +static int m88e_init(struct mii_phy *phy)
> +{
> + printk("%s: Marvell 88E Ethernet\n", __FUNCTION__);
> + phy_write(phy, 0x14, 0x0ce3);
> + phy_write(phy, 0x18, 0x4101);
> + phy_write(phy, 0x09, 0x0e00);
> +
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:13:48 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:27:23 -0400
> > Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Valentine Barshak wrote:
> >>> This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY
On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:27:23 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Valentine Barshak wrote:
>>> This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY support to NEW
>>> EMAC driver.
>>> These PHY chips are used on PowerPC 440EPx boards.
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:27:23 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY support to NEW EMAC driver.
> > These PHY chips are used on PowerPC 440EPx boards.
> > The PHY code is based on the previous work by Stefan Roese
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 07:05 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 15:04 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > I would ideally like a single active patch generator (even if they
> > are
> > merely reviewed others work sometimes).
> >
> > Outside of that, I'm hoping you and the other
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 15:04 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I would ideally like a single active patch generator (even if they
> are
> merely reviewed others work sometimes).
>
> Outside of that, I'm hoping you and the other people listed making
> changes will self-organize without my help :)
Josh
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 14:53 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Roland Dreier (2):
>ibm_new_emac: Nuke SET_MODULE_OWNER() use
>ibm_emac: Convert to use napi_struct independent of struct
> net_device
>
Wow, I'd have loved to be CCed at least on the last one since I was
about to do just th
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:53:26 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seems sane to me -- ACK -- but we have multiple people sending me
patches for a single driver. That's normal for janitorial cleanups
across the whole tree, but discouraged when multiple
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:53:26 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Seems sane to me -- ACK -- but we have multiple people sending me
> >> patches for a single driver. That's normal for janitorial cleanups
> >> across the whole tree, but discouraged when multiple people are actively
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:27:23 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Valentine Barshak wrote:
>>> This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY support to NEW EMAC driver.
>>> These PHY chips are used on PowerPC 440EPx boards.
>>> The PHY code is based on the prev
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:27:23 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY support to NEW EMAC driver.
> > These PHY chips are used on PowerPC 440EPx boards.
> > The PHY code is based on the previous work by Stefan Roese
Valentine Barshak wrote:
> This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY support to NEW EMAC driver.
> These PHY chips are used on PowerPC 440EPx boards.
> The PHY code is based on the previous work by Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-
13 matches
Mail list logo
