Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:27:23 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Valentine Barshak wrote:
>>> This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E1111 PHY support to NEW EMAC driver.
>>> These PHY chips are used on PowerPC 440EPx boards.
>>> The PHY code is based on the previous work by Stefan Roese <[EMAIL
>>> PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ibm_newemac/phy.c | 39
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> --- linux.orig/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/phy.c 2007-06-15
>>> 21:45:18.000000000 +0400
>>> +++ linux/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/phy.c 2007-06-15 20:45:15.000000000
>>> +0400
>>> @@ -306,8 +306,47 @@
>>> .ops = &cis8201_phy_ops
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static struct mii_phy_def bcm5248_phy_def = {
>>> +
>>> + .phy_id = 0x0143bc00,
>>> + .phy_id_mask = 0x0ffffff0,
>>> + .name = "BCM5248 10/100 SMII Ethernet",
>>> + .ops = &generic_phy_ops
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int m88e1111_init(struct mii_phy *phy)
>>> +{
>>> + printk("%s: Marvell 88E1111 Ethernet\n", __FUNCTION__);
>>> + phy_write(phy, 0x14, 0x0ce3);
>>> + phy_write(phy, 0x18, 0x4101);
>>> + phy_write(phy, 0x09, 0x0e00);
>>> + phy_write(phy, 0x04, 0x01e1);
>>> + phy_write(phy, 0x00, 0x9140);
>>> + phy_write(phy, 0x00, 0x1140);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static struct mii_phy_ops m88e1111_phy_ops = {
>>> + .init = m88e1111_init,
>>> + .setup_aneg = genmii_setup_aneg,
>>> + .setup_forced = genmii_setup_forced,
>>> + .poll_link = genmii_poll_link,
>>> + .read_link = genmii_read_link
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct mii_phy_def m88e1111_phy_def = {
>>> +
>>> + .phy_id = 0x01410CC0,
>>> + .phy_id_mask = 0x0ffffff0,
>>> + .name = "Marvell 88E1111 Ethernet",
>>> + .ops = &m88e1111_phy_ops,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> static struct mii_phy_def *mii_phy_table[] = {
>>> &cis8201_phy_def,
>>> + &bcm5248_phy_def,
>>> + &m88e1111_phy_def,
>>> &genmii_phy_def,
>> Seems sane to me -- ACK -- but we have multiple people sending me
>> patches for a single driver. That's normal for janitorial cleanups
>> across the whole tree, but discouraged when multiple people are actively
>> working on the same driver.
>>
>> Please coordinate, and have ONE person send me patches...
>
> Who else is sending you patches? Valentine is the only one I've seen
> send patches recently...
It's a zoo :)
Al Viro (3):
typo in ibm_newemac/rgmii.c
skb->tail in ibm_newemac should be skb_tail_pointer()
ibm_newemac annotations (iomem, NULL noise)
David Gibson (1):
Device tree aware EMAC driver
Michael Ellerman (3):
Update ibm_newemac to use dcr_host_t.base
Add dcr_host_t.base in dcr_read()/dcr_write()
Use dcr_host_t.base in dcr_unmap()
Roland Dreier (2):
ibm_new_emac: Nuke SET_MODULE_OWNER() use
ibm_emac: Convert to use napi_struct independent of struct net_device
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (1):
Fix typo in new EMAC driver.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
