On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:53:26 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Seems sane to me -- ACK -- but we have multiple people sending me > >> patches for a single driver. That's normal for janitorial cleanups > >> across the whole tree, but discouraged when multiple people are actively > >> working on the same driver. > >> > >> Please coordinate, and have ONE person send me patches... > > > > Who else is sending you patches? Valentine is the only one I've seen > > send patches recently... > > It's a zoo :)
Wow, indeed. > Al Viro (3): > typo in ibm_newemac/rgmii.c Val sent this as well. Either one works. > skb->tail in ibm_newemac should be skb_tail_pointer() > ibm_newemac annotations (iomem, NULL noise) Ack on those. > David Gibson (1): > Device tree aware EMAC driver That's the initial commit :) > Michael Ellerman (3): > Update ibm_newemac to use dcr_host_t.base > Add dcr_host_t.base in dcr_read()/dcr_write() > Use dcr_host_t.base in dcr_unmap() Missed those, but I see you applied them which is good. > Roland Dreier (2): > ibm_new_emac: Nuke SET_MODULE_OWNER() use > ibm_emac: Convert to use napi_struct independent of struct net_device I never saw either of these. I'm also beginning to wonder if one of them broke things because I can't currently get ibm_newemac to work. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1): > Fix typo in new EMAC driver. Same fix as Al's. Anyway, we can queue patches to this through me if you'd like. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
