On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:11:55 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
> > On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
> > As Josh, mentioned, I will be working on thi
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
> On 06/15/11 15:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>
Hi,
have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
On 06/15/11 15:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
As Josh, mentioned, I will be working on this. In fact I was trying a couple of
patc
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:30 +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > The PPC440X currently uses 256M TLB entries to pin the
> > lowmem. When we go for a relocatable kernel we have to :
> >
> > 1) Restrict the kernel load address to be 256M aligned
> >
> > OR
> >
> > 2) Use 16M TLB(the next possible TLB p
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
> On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
> As Josh, mentioned, I will be working on this. In fact I was trying a couple
> of
> patches towards this on PPC440x. But,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:30 AM, David Laight wrote:
>
> > The PPC440X currently uses 256M TLB entries to pin the
> > lowmem. When we go for a relocatable kernel we have to :
> >
> > 1) Restrict the kernel load address to be 256M aligned
> >
> > OR
> >
> > 2) Use 16M TLB(the next possible TLB pag
> The PPC440X currently uses 256M TLB entries to pin the
> lowmem. When we go for a relocatable kernel we have to :
>
> 1) Restrict the kernel load address to be 256M aligned
>
> OR
>
> 2) Use 16M TLB(the next possible TLB page size supported)
> entries till the first
> 256M and then use the
On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
As Josh, mentioned, I will be working on this. In fact I was trying a couple of
patches towards this on PPC440x. But, I am stuck in debugging the hang that I am
experiencing with the changes.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 02:04:45PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>Hi,
>
>have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
Suzuki will be working on this eventually as part of getting kexec/kdump
working for 44x. I've CC'd him.
josh
___
Linuxppc
