On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 10:00:12PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> So if mkimage is going to be put in-kernel, I'd rather it be in a more
> generic place. Arguably, dtc should go there as well seeing as how
> microblaze could probably use it too.
Well, kconfig is in scripts/ in spite of not being a s
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 20:26:25 -0600
Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:22:46 +1100
> Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Josh Boyer writes:
> >
> > > Using that same reasoning, should we merge a mkimage patch for the
> > > boards that use U-Boot?
> >
> > I t
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:22:46 +1100
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Boyer writes:
>
> > Using that same reasoning, should we merge a mkimage patch for the
> > boards that use U-Boot?
>
> I think so. It's fairly small and it would mean that people could
> cross-compile all the def
Josh Boyer writes:
> Using that same reasoning, should we merge a mkimage patch for the
> boards that use U-Boot?
I think so. It's fairly small and it would mean that people could
cross-compile all the defconfigs easily.
Paul.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:54:38 +
David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 22:33 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Make vmlinux the default target instead of zImage would seem like a
> > better answer. I'm surprised that it isn't like that already, in fact --
> > and
David Woodhouse writes:
> Make vmlinux the default target instead of zImage would seem like a
> better answer. I'm surprised that it isn't like that already, in fact --
> and I'm only inferring that it isn't from your message. I always thought
> that if I typed 'make' I got the vmlinux and not a z
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 22:33 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Make vmlinux the default target instead of zImage would seem like a
> better answer. I'm surprised that it isn't like that already, in fact --
> and I'm only inferring that it isn't from your message. I always thought
> that if I typed 'm
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:21:21 +1100
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Woodhouse writes:
>
> > I think this is a bad idea -- it's hardly a difficult for those people
> > who _do_ need dts to obtain it separately.
>
> The trouble is that it's not just people who are making a kernel f
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 09:21 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> David Woodhouse writes:
>
> > I think this is a bad idea -- it's hardly a difficult for those people
> > who _do_ need dts to obtain it separately.
>
> The trouble is that it's not just people who are making a kernel for a
> specific embe
David Woodhouse writes:
> I think this is a bad idea -- it's hardly a difficult for those people
> who _do_ need dts to obtain it separately.
The trouble is that it's not just people who are making a kernel for a
specific embedded board that need dtc. These days anyone who wants to
try cross-com
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 10:04:53AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2007, at 9:26 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:25:57 -0600
> > Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> So, like, the other day David Woodhouse mumbled:
> >>>
> >>> I think this is a bad idea -- it
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 07:25:57AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> So, like, the other day David Woodhouse mumbled:
> >
> > I think this is a bad idea -- it's hardly a difficult for those people
> > who _do_ need dts to obtain it separately.
> >
> > We shouldn't be merging _more_ stuff in.
>
> Than
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 14:10 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> We've been back and forth on this several times, Paul and I finally
> concluded this was the better option.
As long as I can just ignore it and use the separately-shipped dtc, I
suppose it doesn't have to bother me too much.
> It means we c
On Dec 4, 2007, at 9:26 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:25:57 -0600
> Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So, like, the other day David Woodhouse mumbled:
>>>
>>> I think this is a bad idea -- it's hardly a difficult for those
>>> people
>>> who _do_ need dts to obtain i
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:25:57 -0600
Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, like, the other day David Woodhouse mumbled:
> >
> > I think this is a bad idea -- it's hardly a difficult for those people
> > who _do_ need dts to obtain it separately.
> >
> > We shouldn't be merging _more_ stuff
So, like, the other day David Woodhouse mumbled:
>
> I think this is a bad idea -- it's hardly a difficult for those people
> who _do_ need dts to obtain it separately.
>
> We shouldn't be merging _more_ stuff in.
Thanks for chiming in here, David W. As far as I can tell
so far, the only two pe
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:59:04AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 15:02 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > This very large patch incorporates a copy of dtc into the kernel
> > source, in arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-src. This means that dtc is no
> > longer an external dependency to
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 15:02 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> This very large patch incorporates a copy of dtc into the kernel
> source, in arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-src. This means that dtc is no
> longer an external dependency to build kernels with configurations
> which need a dtb file.
>
> Signed-off
David Gibson wrote:
>
> Ok. I'll use this version in my next spin; except for adding one
> dependency you missed, and removing one which should never have been
> there (unneccessary #include, which I've already fixed in dtc
> upstream).
>
I think if we embed the DTC in the kernel tree, we shoul
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 08:42:49PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi David.
>
> > > Give me a day or two then I shall give it a try and see what I can
> > > do about it. I will use the previsous posted URL as basis if you do
> > > not tell me otherwise.
> >
> > Thank you. The previous URL should
Hi David.
> > Give me a day or two then I shall give it a try and see what I can
> > do about it. I will use the previsous posted URL as basis if you do
> > not tell me otherwise.
>
> Thank you. The previous URL should be fine, I've made no changes
> since then.
I decided to go for a kbuild sp
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:07:18AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Compared to the behemoth that is Kbuild...
> >
> > I'm happy to improve the Makefile integration, but you seem to be
> > rather vague on how, and the Kbuild documentation makes my brain hurt.
>
> I can make an ALL UPPERCASE VERSION
> Compared to the behemoth that is Kbuild...
>
> I'm happy to improve the Makefile integration, but you seem to be
> rather vague on how, and the Kbuild documentation makes my brain hurt.
I can make an ALL UPPERCASE VERSION if that makes it easier for you to read ;-)
Give me a day or two then I s
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:56:41AM -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2007, at 8:45 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:59:26PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:49:54PM -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
> >>> On Tue Oct 16 15:02:17 EST 2007, David Gibson
On Oct 18, 2007, at 8:45 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:59:26PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:49:54PM -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
>>> On Tue Oct 16 15:02:17 EST 2007, David Gibson wrote:
>>>
This very large patch incorporates a copy of dtc into
On Oct 18, 2007, at 8:30 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:49:54PM -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
>> On Tue Oct 16 15:02:17 EST 2007, David Gibson wrote:
>>> Too big for the list, full patch at
>>> http://ozlabs.org/~dgibson/home/merge-dtc.patch+
>>
>> So split it up. The obviou
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:59:26PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:49:54PM -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
> > On Tue Oct 16 15:02:17 EST 2007, David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > >This very large patch incorporates a copy of dtc into the kernel
> > >source, in arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-sr
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:49:54PM -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
> On Tue Oct 16 15:02:17 EST 2007, David Gibson wrote:
>
> > This very large patch incorporates a copy of dtc into the kernel
> > source, in arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-src. This means that dtc is no
> > longer an external dependency to bui
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:49:54PM -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
> On Tue Oct 16 15:02:17 EST 2007, David Gibson wrote:
>
> >This very large patch incorporates a copy of dtc into the kernel
> >source, in arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-src. This means that dtc is no
> >longer an external dependency to build
On Tue Oct 16 15:02:17 EST 2007, David Gibson wrote:
> This very large patch incorporates a copy of dtc into the kernel
> source, in arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-src. This means that dtc is no
> longer an external dependency to build kernels with configurations
> which need a dtb file.
>
> Signed-off-by
So, like, the other day Linas Vepstas mumbled:
>
> Isn't anyone concerned about the defacto fork-of-source-code that
> this causes?
You betcha. That's why I'm negative on the notion,
but I won't stand in front of _that_ train either.
> Which will be the official version?
The one I am maintain
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:59:04PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> > Just out of interest who's complaining? We don't include mkimage for
> > u-boot related builds and I haven't seen any gripes related to that.
>
> I think we should include mkimage *and* dtc. But then, I'm no
On 10/17/07, Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:59:04 -0500
> Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Kumar Gala wrote:
> >
> > > Just out of interest who's complaining? We don't include mkimage for
> > > u-boot related builds and I haven't seen any gripes related t
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:59:04 -0500
Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> > Just out of interest who's complaining? We don't include mkimage for
> > u-boot related builds and I haven't seen any gripes related to that.
>
> I think we should include mkimage *and* dtc. Bu
Kumar Gala wrote:
> Just out of interest who's complaining? We don't include mkimage for
> u-boot related builds and I haven't seen any gripes related to that.
I think we should include mkimage *and* dtc. But then, I'm not sure how much
weight my opinion has. :-)
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> g
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
zlabs.org] On Behalf Of Grant Likely
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 6:15 AM
> To: Grant Likely; Paul Mackerras; Josh Boyer; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: Merge dtc
On 10/16/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:17:01AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On 10/15/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This very large patch incorporates a copy of dtc into the kernel
> > > source, in arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-src. This mean
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:17:01AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/15/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This very large patch incorporates a copy of dtc into the kernel
> > source, in arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-src. This means that dtc is no
> > longer an external dependency to build k
On Oct 16, 2007, at 8:17 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/15/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This very large patch incorporates a copy of dtc into the kernel
>> source, in arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-src. This means that dtc is no
>> longer an external dependency to build kernels with co
On 10/15/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This very large patch incorporates a copy of dtc into the kernel
> source, in arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-src. This means that dtc is no
> longer an external dependency to build kernels with configurations
> which need a dtb file.
Powerpc is probab
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:01 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 00:50 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Just out of interest who's complaining? We don't include mkimage
> > for
> > u-boot related builds and I haven't seen any gripes related to that.
>
> It's a pain in the ne
On Oct 16, 2007, at 1:00 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
>> You must have missed the thread where various people where
>> complaining
>> about how powerpc is the only architecture where they can't build
>> kernels without some external tool that they don't have, etc., etc.
>>
>> We thought
On Oct 16, 2007, at 1:01 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 00:50 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Just out of interest who's complaining? We don't include mkimage
>> for
>> u-boot related builds and I haven't seen any gripes related to that.
>
> It's a pain in the neck since
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 00:50 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Just out of interest who's complaining? We don't include mkimage
> for
> u-boot related builds and I haven't seen any gripes related to that.
It's a pain in the neck since those are built even for things that don't
need them (such as 4xx w
> You must have missed the thread where various people where complaining
> about how powerpc is the only architecture where they can't build
> kernels without some external tool that they don't have, etc., etc.
>
> We thought about shipping compiled DTBs for various platforms, but the
> problem t
On Oct 16, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Kumar Gala writes:
>
>> Dare I ask why we are including dtc in the kernel source tree? We
>> don't really have precedence for this and there are users outside of
>> linux for dtc.
>
> You must have missed the thread where various people where
Kumar Gala writes:
> Dare I ask why we are including dtc in the kernel source tree? We
> don't really have precedence for this and there are users outside of
> linux for dtc.
You must have missed the thread where various people where complaining
about how powerpc is the only architecture whe
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 12:08:06AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Oct 16, 2007, at 12:02 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>
> > This very large patch incorporates a copy of dtc into the kernel
> > source, in arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-src. This means that dtc is no
> > longer an external dependency to build
On Oct 16, 2007, at 12:02 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> This very large patch incorporates a copy of dtc into the kernel
> source, in arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-src. This means that dtc is no
> longer an external dependency to build kernels with configurations
> which need a dtb file.
>
> Signed-off-by:
49 matches
Mail list logo
