On Dec 4, 2007, at 9:26 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:25:57 -0600 > Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> So, like, the other day David Woodhouse mumbled: >>> >>> I think this is a bad idea -- it's hardly a difficult for those >>> people >>> who _do_ need dts to obtain it separately. >>> >>> We shouldn't be merging _more_ stuff in. >> >> Thanks for chiming in here, David W. As far as I can tell >> so far, the only two people who have voiced an opinion on >> this issue are Dave G, submitting patches, and me disagreeing >> with the approach. :-) >> >> Anyone else? > > I don't see an overwhelmingly great reason to merge it. It might help > test people who do automated rebuilds, etc and aren't used to dealing > with powerpc and it's requirements. Outside of that, I see it as > dual-maintenance. > > But I'm not doing the maintenance, and it doesn't effect me too much. > I only ask that a decision is made and executed on soon so we can move > on.
I'm also in disagreement of duplicating dtc in the kernel. However, if we are going to do this we should make the path expansion for labels work before we do it. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
