Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

2015-10-07 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
rote: > > > > From e29a7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu > > > > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400 > > > > Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to > > > >

Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

2015-10-06 Thread Michael Ellerman
00 2001 > > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu > > > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400 > > > Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to > > > sample_reg_masks > > > > > > perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is

Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

2015-09-30 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
:49 -0400 > > Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks > > > > perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false. > > So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get picked up. > > > >

Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

2015-09-30 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > From e29a7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to samp

[PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

2015-09-30 Thread Sukadev Bhattiprolu
From e29a7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false. So the weak