Em Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 11:46:38AM +1100, Michael Ellerman escreveu: > On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 16:45 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > > > > From e29aeeee7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400 > > > > Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to > > > > sample_reg_masks > > > > > > > > perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false. > > > > So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get picked up. > > > > > > > > Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition > > > > error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version > > > > in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that > > > > function. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org> > > > > Thanks, applied. > > Is this going to Linus' tree any time soon? > > I have folks pinging me to say that perf is broken on powerpc.
Checking this now. - Arnaldo _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
