Em Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > > From e29aeeee7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400 > > Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks > > > > perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false. > > So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get picked up. > > > > Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition > > error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version > > in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that > > function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org>
Thanks, applied. - Arnaldo _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
