On Sep 13, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> What is a "front side cache"? What exactly does it cache? If it's
>>> a cache for one CPU only, that fact should be shown in the device
>>> tree somehow.
>>
>> Its in front of the memory controllers. Its not specific to a
>> given C
>> What is a "front side cache"? What exactly does it cache? If it's
>> a cache for one CPU only, that fact should be shown in the device
>> tree somehow.
>
> Its in front of the memory controllers. Its not specific to a given
> CPU.
Ah, I see. That relationship is implicit in the device tree
On Sep 12, 2007, at 8:20 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
+ compatible = "fsl,8572-l2-cache-controller";
+ reg = <2 1000>;
+ cache-line-size = <20>; // 32 bytes
+ cache-siz
>>> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>>> + compatible = "fsl,8572-l2-cache-controller";
>>> + reg = <2 1000>;
>>> + cache-line-size = <20>; // 32 bytes
>>> + cache-size = <8>; // L2, 512K
>>> + interr
>>> well the ifdefs are orthogonal. We don't have a way of knowing
>>> primary from the device tree today.
>>
>> How about something like "fsl,primary-phb" in the bus device node? I
>> don't
>> know, maybe it's already been discussed and turned down for some
>> reason.
>
> It's more of a Linux i
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:35:01PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 10:00 PM, David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:59:22PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>
> >>> Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 200
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:35:01PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > In the meantime, couldn't the code still be merged, using an explicit
> > test of the root node's 'compatible' or 'model' properties to decide
> > on the right primary bus.
>
> I will be, I'm not going to wait on having some device tr
On Sep 11, 2007, at 10:00 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:59:22PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> Olof Johansson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:21:30PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:59:22PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:21:30PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>> Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:00:28AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrot
On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:21:30PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> Olof Johansson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:00:28AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> well the ifdefs are orthogonal. We don't have a way of knowing
>
Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:21:30PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:00:28AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
well the ifdefs are orthogonal. We don't have a way of knowing
primary from the device tree today.
>>> How about
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:21:30PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:00:28AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> well the ifdefs are orthogonal. We don't have a way of knowing
> >> primary from the device tree today.
> >
> > How about something like "fsl,
Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:00:28AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> well the ifdefs are orthogonal. We don't have a way of knowing
>> primary from the device tree today.
>
> How about something like "fsl,primary-phb" in the bus device node? I don't
> know, maybe it's already
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:00:28AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:50:18AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>> How different are these boards really? Could you just detect
> >>> MPC85xxDS
> >>> and have a generic plat
On Sep 11, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:50:18AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
index 3a5c3c4..1e2eba8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mp
On Sep 11, 2007, at 9:17 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:29:18AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds.dts b/arch/powerpc/
>> boot/dts/mpc8572ds.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..9d23561
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:50:18AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
>>> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
>>> index 3a5c3c4..1e2eba8 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds
On Sep 11, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:29:18AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Added basic board port for MPC8572 DS reference platform that is
>> similiar to the MPC8544/33 DS reference platform in uniprocessor
>> mode.
>>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/arc
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:29:18AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Added basic board port for MPC8572 DS reference platform that is
> similiar to the MPC8544/33 DS reference platform in uniprocessor mode.
>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/8
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:29:18AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds.dts
> b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..9d23561
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
> +/*
> + * MPC8572
Added basic board port for MPC8572 DS reference platform that is
similiar to the MPC8544/33 DS reference platform in uniprocessor mode.
---
Posted here for review. Patch exists in my for-2.6.24 branch. Removed
defconfig to reduce patch review size.
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds.dts |
21 matches
Mail list logo
