On Sep 11, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:29:18AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Added basic board port for MPC8572 DS reference platform that is
>> similiar to the MPC8544/33 DS reference platform in uniprocessor  
>> mode.
>>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c b/arch/ 
>> powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
>> index 3a5c3c4..1e2eba8 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
>> @@ -181,6 +181,23 @@ static int __init mpc8544_ds_probe(void)
>>      }
>>  }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Called very early, device-tree isn't unflattened
>> + */
>> +static int __init mpc8572_ds_probe(void)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long root = of_get_flat_dt_root();
>> +
>> +    if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(root, "MPC8572DS")) {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
>> +            primary_phb_addr = 0x8000;
>> +#endif
>> +            return 1;
>> +    } else {
>> +            return 0;
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>>  define_machine(mpc8544_ds) {
>>      .name                   = "MPC8544 DS",
>>      .probe                  = mpc8544_ds_probe,
>> @@ -194,3 +211,17 @@ define_machine(mpc8544_ds) {
>>      .calibrate_decr         = generic_calibrate_decr,
>>      .progress               = udbg_progress,
>>  };
>> +
>> +define_machine(mpc8572_ds) {
>> +    .name                   = "MPC8572 DS",
>> +    .probe                  = mpc8572_ds_probe,
>> +    .setup_arch             = mpc85xx_ds_setup_arch,
>> +    .init_IRQ               = mpc85xx_ds_pic_init,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
>> +    .pcibios_fixup_bus      = fsl_pcibios_fixup_bus,
>> +#endif
>> +    .get_irq                = mpic_get_irq,
>> +    .restart                = mpc85xx_restart,
>> +    .calibrate_decr         = generic_calibrate_decr,
>> +    .progress               = udbg_progress,
>> +};
>
> How different are these boards really? Could you just detect MPC85xxDS
> and have a generic platform for them, or are they different enough  
> that
> you need individual ones for it?

I wanted a different probe.  I figured having a different struct was  
a simple solution.

>
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
>> index 06d23e1..c98b867 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
>> @@ -374,10 +374,9 @@
>>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP400_SATA   0x4379
>>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP400_SATA2      0x437a
>>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP600_SATA       0x4380
>> -#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP600_SMBUS      0x4385
>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_SBX00_SMBUS       0x4385
>>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP600_IDE        0x438c
>>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP700_SATA       0x4390
>> -#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP700_SMBUS      0x4395
>>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP700_IDE        0x439c
>
> This looks like it doesn't belong in this patch.

oops :)  {copying from an different tree}

- k


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to