Re: "eth1: Could not attach to PHY" on MPC8349e-MITX

2008-12-04 Thread Andre Schwarz
Timur Tabi schrieb: > Andre Schwarz wrote: > >> Timur, >> >> is it possible that the PHY adress doesn't match the one specified in >> the dts ? >> > > What part of the DTS contains the PHY address? I have this: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] { > #address-cells = <1>; >

Re: "eth1: Could not attach to PHY" on MPC8349e-MITX

2008-12-04 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:47:26AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > Andre Schwarz wrote: > > Timur, > > > > is it possible that the PHY adress doesn't match the one specified in > > the dts ? > > What part of the DTS contains the PHY address? I have this: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] { >

Re: "eth1: Could not attach to PHY" on MPC8349e-MITX

2008-12-04 Thread Timur Tabi
Andre Schwarz wrote: > Timur, > > is it possible that the PHY adress doesn't match the one specified in > the dts ? What part of the DTS contains the PHY address? I have this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; co

Re: "eth1: Could not attach to PHY" on MPC8349e-MITX

2008-12-04 Thread Andre Schwarz
Timur, is it possible that the PHY adress doesn't match the one specified in the dts ? regards, Andre Timur Tabi schrieb: > The Freescale MPC8349e-MITX reference board has two TSECs, the second > of which (eth1) is attached to a Vitesse 7385 5-port switch. > > Using the latest U-Boot, Kernel, an

"eth1: Could not attach to PHY" on MPC8349e-MITX

2008-12-04 Thread Timur Tabi
The Freescale MPC8349e-MITX reference board has two TSECs, the second of which (eth1) is attached to a Vitesse 7385 5-port switch. Using the latest U-Boot, Kernel, and device tree, I cannot bring up eth1. When I try, I get this message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ifconfig eth1 up 0:01 not found et