From: Scott Wood
The driver retains compatibility with old device trees, but we don't
want the old nodes lying around to be copied, or used as a reference
(some of the mux options are incorrect), or even just being clutter.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood
Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian
---
v3:
- upd
Add more SoC compatible strings to support more chips.
Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang
---
v3:
- undo deleting old bindings
- split the dts and driver to different patchset
.../devicetree/bindings/clock/qoriq-clock.txt |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff
The compatible string is not correct in the clock node.
The clocks property refers to the wrong node too.
This patch is to fix them.
Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1023si-post.dtsi |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/p
ux...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
> d...@lists.ozlabs.org; Yuantian Tang ; Yang-Leo Li
> ; Xiaofeng Ren
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: qoriq: Don't look at clock
> implementation details
>
> On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 19:26 -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting S
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:24 AM
> To: Yuantian Tang
> Cc: Scott Wood ; Russell King ;
> Michael Turquette ; Stephen Boyd
> ; Viresh Kumar ; linux-
> c...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@v
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:47 AM
> To: Yuantian Tang
> Cc: Scott Wood ; Russell King ;
> Michael Turquette ; Stephen Boyd
> ; Viresh Kumar ; linux-
> c...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@v
> ; Stephen Boyd ;
> Viresh Kumar ; Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
> d...@lists.ozlabs.org; Yuantian Tang ; Yang-Leo Li
> ; Xiaofeng Ren ; Scott Wood
>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discoverin
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 10:32 AM
> To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
> robh...@kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Wang Huan-
> B18965 ; Jin Zhengxiong-R641
From: Tang Yuantian
There is a RCPM (Run Control/Power Management) in Freescale QorIQ
series processors. The device performs tasks associated with device
run control and power management.
The driver implements some features: mask/unmask irq, enter/exit low
power states, freeze time base, etc.
S
Please see my replay inline.
Thanks,
Yuantian
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Cochran [mailto:p...@mindchasers.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 2:00 AM
> To: Tang Yuantian-B29983; Wood Scott-B07421
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Zhao Chenhui-B35336
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] p
That makes sense. Thanks for pointing out.
Thanks,
Yuantian
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Bolle [mailto:pebo...@tiscali.nl]
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 4:58 PM
> To: Tang Yuantian-B29983
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicet
Please see my replay inline.
From: Wood Scott-B07421
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:28 AM
To: Tang Yuantian-B29983
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Zhao Chenhui-B35336; Tang Yuantian
Subject: Re: [PATCH v
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 7:56 AM
> To: Tang Yuantian-B29983
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Xie Shaohui-B21989
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/config: add SCSI configs for
> corenet64_smp_defconfig
>
> On Tue, 2015
> -Original Message-
> From: Emil Medve [mailto:emilian.me...@freescale.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:04 PM
> To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
> mturque...@linaro.org; haoke...@gmail.com; Tang Yuantian-B29983
> Cc: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
> Subject: [PATCH v
> -Original Message-
> From: Emil Medve [mailto:emilian.me...@freescale.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:04 PM
> To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
> mturque...@linaro.org; haoke...@gmail.com; Tang Yuantian-B29983
> Cc: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
> Subject: [PATCH v
Hello Emil,
From the RM and your code, I didn't see any difference between the two type of
PLL.
Could you provide some use cases or feature that prove this is necessary?
If there did have some features that current function didn't contain, can we
expend the current one to include it?
BTW: if y
Hi Emil,
I don't think it is the best to add a function that is very similar to existing
one.
If you think the function name is not appropriate, rename it.
Thanks,
Yuantian
> -Original Message-
> From: Emil Medve [mailto:emilian.me...@freescale.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Which platform are you trying to use this on? Can this be initialized by core
pll function core_pll_init()?
I just saw most of this function is silimar to the core_pll_init().
Thanks,
Yuantian
> -Original Message-
> From: Emil Medve [mailto:emilian.me...@freescale.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, J
Hi Emil,
Thanks for fixing those warnings. The patch set you based on is merged.
I sent another two patches and one of them got merged. You probably need to
rebase your patches.
My patch link:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/429257/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/429258/
Thanks,
Yuantian
>
PING!
Thanks,
Yuantian
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Hao [mailto:haoke...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 4:54 PM
> To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; Wood Scott-B07421; Mike Turquette; Lu
> Jingchang-B35083; Gerhard Sittig; Tang Yuantian-
Hello Mike,
Could you please apply this patch?
This patch has been acked for a while.
Thanks,
Yuantian
> -Original Message-
> From: Linuxppc-dev
> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+b29983=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org] On
> Behalf Of Scott Wood
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 12:08 PM
> To
Hello Viresh,
When I use -C -M options, checkpatch reports error:
[tangyt@titan linux-pm]$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl
0002-cpufreq-qoriq-rename-the-driver.patch
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#15:
drivers/cpufreq/{ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c => qoriq-cpufreq.
PATCH] cpufreq: qoriq: Make the driver usable on all QorIQ
> platforms
>
> On 21 October 2014 14:29, Yuantian Tang
> wrote:
> > If I do so, menuconfig will display like this(on PPC):
> > PowerPC CPU frequency scaling drivers
> > QorIQ CPU Frequency
> > -config PPC_CORENET_CPUFREQ
> > - tristate "CPU frequency scaling driver for Freescale E500MC SoCs"
> > - depends on PPC_E500MC && OF && COMMON_CLK
> > +config QORIQ_CPUFREQ
> > + tristate "CPU frequency scaling driver for Freescale QorIQ SoCs"
> > + depends on OF && COM
> > #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> > static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_core_mask(int cpu) { @@ -79,6
> > +75,79 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_core_mask(int cpu) }
> > #endif
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_E500MC)
>
> Probably should just be CONFIG_PPC, but do we need this at all. Can't
Thanks for your comments. Your comments will be addressed in next version.
Some explanations inline.
Thanks,
Yuantian
> -Original Message-
> From: Viresh Kumar [mailto:viresh.ku...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 4:09 PM
> To: Tang Yuantian-B29983
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki; Li
Thanks for your comments. Will address them in next version.
Also some explanations inline for your comments.
Thanks,
Yuantian
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 4:04 PM
> To: Tang Yuantian-B29983
> Cc: r...@rjwysoc
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 7:58 AM
> To: Tang Yuantian-B29983
> Cc: Mike Turquette; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
> linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Lu Jingchang-B35083
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] cl
> -Original Message-
> From: Linuxppc-dev
> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+b29983=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org] On
> Behalf Of Mike Turquette
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 7:29 AM
> To: Wood Scott-B07421
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-k
> > > > > In any case, if "qoriq" makes sense for the compatible, I don't
> > > > > see why it doesn't make sense for the driver.
> > > > >
> > > > So, "Corenet" is appropriate for driver.
> > > > If something should change, that must be compatible string.
> > >
> > > No. Corenet is a bus intercon
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: 2014年1月24日 星期五 10:36
> To: Tang Yuantian-B29983
> Cc: ga...@kernel.crashing.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: corenet: Update the clock bindings
>
>
> > > Instead, how about a note like this near the top of the file:
> > >
> > > All references to "1.0" and "2.0" refer to the QorIQ chassis version
> > > to which the chip complies.
> > >
> > > Chassis Version Example Chips
> > > --- -
> > > 1.0
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: 2014年1月23日 星期四 8:44
> To: Tang Yuantian-B29983
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; linuxppc-
> d...@lists.ozlabs.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; Kushwaha Prabhakar-
> B32579
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: corenet: Update t
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: 2014年1月18日 星期六 9:06
> To: Tang Yuantian-B29983
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li Yang-Leo-
> R58472
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] clk:
Thanks for your review.
Thanks,
Yuantian
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: 2014年1月11日 星期六 4:20
> To: Tang Yuantian-B29983
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li Yang-Leo
e: 答复: [v7] clk: corenet: Adds the clock binding
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 09:30 +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 08:53:56AM +, Yuantian Tang wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > ___
g
> Subject: Re: 答复: [v7] clk: corenet: Adds the clock binding
>
> On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 09:30 +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 08:53:56AM +, Yuantian Tang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > 发件人:
发件人: Wood Scott-B07421
发送时间: 2014年1月8日 8:21
收件人: Tang Yuantian-B29983
抄送: ga...@kernel.crashing.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com;
devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
主题: Re: [v7] clk: corenet: Adds the clock binding
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at
PING.
Thanks,
Yuantian
> -Original Message-
> From: Tang Yuantian-B29983
> Sent: 2013年11月20日 星期三 17:05
> To: ga...@kernel.crashing.org
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
> mark.rutl...@arm.com; Wood Scott-B07421; grant.lik...@secretlab.ca; Tang
> Yuantian-B29
Hi Scott,
Do you have any comments about this patch? If not, please pick it up.
Thanks,
Yuantian
> -Original Message-
> From: Tang Yuantian-B29983
> Sent: 2013年11月20日 星期三 17:05
> To: ga...@kernel.crashing.org
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
> mark.rutl...@
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/corenet-clock.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
> > +* Clock Block on Freescale CoreNet Platforms
> > +
> > +Freescale CoreNet chips take primary clocking input from the external
> > +SYSCLK signal. The SYSCLK input (frequency) is multiplied using
> > +mult
41 matches
Mail list logo