Re: [PATCH] powerpc/booke: Fix definitions for dbcr[1-2] and dbsr registers

2008-06-11 Thread Jerone Young
Looks good to me. Yeah moving many of the aliases to 40x is much cleaner. On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 13:38 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > From: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This takes values from the PowerPC ISA BookIII-E specifications that are > for DBCR0. Many of these va

[v4] Fix definitions for dbcr0, dbcr1, & dbcr2 register for bookE processors

2008-06-06 Thread Jerone Young
& DBCR2. Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/reg_booke.h b/include/asm-powerpc/reg_booke.h --- a/include/asm-powerpc/reg_booke.h +++ b/include/asm-powerpc/reg_booke.h @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ #define ESR_BO 0x0002 /* Byte Ordering */

[v3] Fix definitions for dbcr0, dbcr1, & dbcr2 register for bookE processors

2008-06-06 Thread Jerone Young
the PowerPC ISA BookIII-E specifies that DBCR0 is different for all others that are not ppc405 chips. So I have now chnaged the conditional to reflect this. Also added definitions needed for DBCR1 & DBCR2. Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc

Re: [PATCH] [v2] Fix definitions for dbcr0, dbcr1, & dbcr2 register for bookE processors

2008-06-05 Thread Jerone Young
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 11:23 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > On Jun 5, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Jerone Young wrote: > > > Update: Consolidated dbcr1 & dbcr2 under one define. > > > > Taken from the PowerPC ISA BookIII-E specifies that DBCR0 is different > > for all others th

[PATCH] [v2] Fix definitions for dbcr0, dbcr1, & dbcr2 register for bookE processors

2008-06-05 Thread Jerone Young
Update: Consolidated dbcr1 & dbcr2 under one define. Taken from the PowerPC ISA BookIII-E specifies that DBCR0 is different for all others that are not ppc405 chips. So I have now chnaged the conditional to reflect this. Also added definitions needed for DBCR1 & DBCR2. Signed-off-by

Re: [PATCH] Fix definitions for dbcr0, dbcr1, & dbcr2 register for bookE processors

2008-06-05 Thread Jerone Young
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 21:14 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:26:44 -0500 > Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Taken from the PowerPC ISA BookIII-E specifies that DBCR0 is different > > for all others that are not ppc405 chips. So I have now

[PATCH] Fix definitions for dbcr0, dbcr1, & dbcr2 register for bookE processors

2008-06-04 Thread Jerone Young
Taken from the PowerPC ISA BookIII-E specifies that DBCR0 is different for all others that are not ppc405 chips. So I have now chnaged the conditional to reflect this. Also added definitions needed for DBCR1 & DBCR2. Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/i

[PATCH] [v6] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms

2008-04-11 Thread Jerone Young
state while in cpu_idle loop. This helps virtulization solutions know when the guest Linux kernel is in an idle state. There are two ways to do it. Command line options: idle=spin <-- CPU will spin By default will go into wait mode. Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms

2008-04-10 Thread Jerone Young
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 15:44 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Jerone Young wrote: > > +static struct sleep_mode modes[] = { > > + { .name = "wait", .entry = &ppc44x_idle }, > > + { .name = "spin", .entry = NULL }, &

[PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms

2008-04-08 Thread Jerone Young
ll spin idle=wait <-- set CPU into wait state when idle (default) Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Makefile --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Makefile +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Makef

[PATCH] [v4] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms

2008-04-04 Thread Jerone Young
ill be checked for the "/hypervisor" node If this node is seen it will use "wait" for idle, so that the hypervisor can know when guest Linux kernel it is in an idle state. This patch, unlike the last, isolates the code to 44x platforms. Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EM

[PATCH] [v3] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms

2008-04-04 Thread Jerone Young
his node is seen it will use "wait" for idle, so that the hypervisor can know when guest Linux kernel it is in an idle state. This patch, unlike the last, isolates the code to 44x platforms. Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platfo

Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] [v2] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms

2008-04-04 Thread Jerone Young
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 08:36 -0400, Jimi Xenidis wrote: > On Apr 4, 2008, at 3:06 AM, Jerone Young wrote: > > > # HG changeset patch > > # User Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > # Date 1207292108 18000 > > # Node ID afed3e5de82ab6c0a

[PATCH] [v2] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms

2008-04-04 Thread Jerone Young
# HG changeset patch # User Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1207292108 18000 # Node ID afed3e5de82ab6c0ac8d6ceeb0292b6c41ece1ed # Parent a5b2aebbc6ebd2439c655f1c047ed7e3c1991ec1 [v2] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms This patch adds the ability for the CPU to go into wait

Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms

2008-04-03 Thread Jerone Young
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 18:13 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Thursday 03 April 2008 17:43:02 Jerone Young wrote: > > # HG changeset patch > > # User Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > # Date 1207262487 18000 > > # Node ID 7226bef216680748a503

Re: [PATCH] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms

2008-04-03 Thread Jerone Young
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 10:03 +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:43:02PM -0500, Jerone Young wrote: > > Hi Jerone, > A few minor nits. > > Add idle wait support for 44x platforms > > > > This patch adds the ability for the CPU to go into wai

Re: [PATCH] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms

2008-04-03 Thread Jerone Young
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 21:00 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:43:02 -0500 > Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > # HG changeset patch > > # User Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > # Date 1207262487 18000 > > # Nod

[PATCH] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms

2008-04-03 Thread Jerone Young
# HG changeset patch # User Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1207262487 18000 # Node ID 7226bef216680748a50327900572c2fbc3e762b0 # Parent a5b2aebbc6ebd2439c655f1c047ed7e3c1991ec1 Add idle wait support for 44x platforms This patch adds the ability for the CPU to go into wait state wh

Re: [PATCH] Add idle power save for ppc 4xx

2008-03-31 Thread Jerone Young
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 12:07 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 08:12 -0500, Jerone Young wrote: > > # HG changeset patch > > # User Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > # Date 1206969060 18000 > > # Node ID 10aea37177130bbe5de7

Re: [PATCH] Add idle power save for ppc 4xx

2008-03-31 Thread Jerone Young
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 13:05 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:07:17 -0500 > Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 08:12 -0500, Jerone Young wrote: > > > # HG changeset patch > > > # User Jerone Young <[EMAIL

Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add idle power save for ppc 4xx

2008-03-31 Thread Jerone Young
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 11:27 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 08:12 -0500, Jerone Young wrote: > > # HG changeset patch > > # User Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > # Date 1206969060 18000 > > # Node ID 10aea37177130bbe5de7

[PATCH] Add idle power save for ppc 4xx

2008-03-31 Thread Jerone Young
# HG changeset patch # User Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1206969060 18000 # Node ID 10aea37177130bbe5de7bee6ec06d9010bc5da1f # Parent 1506aa38ddabb0bf73fff3ac3f3db5f9ef6458cc Add idle power save for ppc 4xx This patch sets the wait state MSR when power_save is called in cpu_idl

Re: [dtc] breaking out libfdt from dtc so other progs can use it

2008-02-28 Thread Jerone Young
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:59 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:30:44 -0600 > Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:41 +1100, David Gibson wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:40:43PM -0600, Jerone Yo

Re: [dtc] breaking out libfdt from dtc so other progs can use it

2008-02-28 Thread Jerone Young
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:41 +1100, David Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:40:43PM -0600, Jerone Young wrote: > > Currently the dtc source code has libfdt integrated in it. This seems to > > have become place for upstream libfdt changes. Now we all know everyone > >

Re: [dtc] breaking out libfdt from dtc so other progs can use it

2008-02-27 Thread Jerone Young
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 14:31 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:40:43 -0600 > Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Currently the dtc source code has libfdt integrated in it. This seems to > > have become place for upstream libfdt change

[dtc] breaking out libfdt from dtc so other progs can use it

2008-02-27 Thread Jerone Young
Currently the dtc source code has libfdt integrated in it. This seems to have become place for upstream libfdt changes. Now we all know everyone (linux kernel, cuboot) also have their own versions over libfdt. But if another userspace app wants to use libfdt , it has to copy it from the dtc source

Re: [PATCH 0/3] usb: ehci ppc device-tree-aware driver

2007-10-08 Thread Jerone Young
So the issue here with the Sequoia board is that if you load a kernel or initrd from usb stick while under u-boot environment, when Linux boots it will see the network adapter & even set an ip for it. But no matter what it is unable to access any outside ip. The way we recreated this scenario was:

Re: [PATCH 3/4] PowerPC 440EPx: Sequoia bootwrapper

2007-08-15 Thread Jerone Young
What source tree patch based on? The latest kernel.org git tree does not have arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c or arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.h . This patch is attempting to patch these files. On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 22:53 +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote: > Bootwrapper code for AMCC 440EPx Sequoia board. > The DDR2

Re: Sequoia 440EPx patches not working

2007-08-13 Thread Jerone Young
help. Jerone On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 20:33 +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote: > Jerone Young wrote: > > So did a rebase on kernel.org 2.6.23-rc2 patch (as opposed the latest > > git). I am using Uboot version 1.2.0-gc0c292b2. This is the version > > that ca

Re: Sequoia 440EPx patches not working

2007-08-09 Thread Jerone Young
thing else when wrong. I'll see what else I can look at. On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 16:56 +0400, Vitaly Bordug wrote: > On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:45:10 -0500 > Jerone Young wrote: > > > Using the Sequoia (AMCC 440EPx) patches recently submitted to the > > list I am unable to bo

Re: Sequoia 440EPx patches not working

2007-08-09 Thread Jerone Young
Nope definitely using a uImage. I'll try a fresh source and try again .. I did base it on kernel.org git tree so I'll try instead with 2.6.23-rc2 and see what happens. n Thu, 2007-08-09 at 16:56 +0400, Vitaly Bordug wrote: > On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:45:10 -0500 > Jerone Young wro

Sequoia 440EPx patches not working

2007-08-08 Thread Jerone Young
Using the Sequoia (AMCC 440EPx) patches recently submitted to the list I am unable to boot to fully boot a uImage built with these patches under Uboot. It appears to hang in very early boot. Here is the output: => tftp 40 sequoia/uImage ENET