Re: VFIO v2 design plan

2011-09-01 Thread David Gibson
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:27:00PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 14:10 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:51:38AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: [snip] > > > > If you open a group, merge in a bunch of other groups, then re-open > > > > /dev/vfio/NNN for

Re: [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/85xx: Rename PowerPC core nodes to match other e500mc based .dts

2011-09-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 1, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> The P4080 silicon device tree was using PowerPC,4080 while the other >> e500mc based SoCs used PowerPC,e500mc. Use the core name to be >> consistent going forward. > > Shouldn't we chang

Re: [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/85xx: Rename PowerPC core nodes to match other e500mc based .dts

2011-09-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/01/2011 02:26 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> The P4080 silicon device tree was using PowerPC,4080 while the other >> e500mc based SoCs used PowerPC,e500mc. Use the core name to be >> consistent going forward. > > Why are we not using the generic n

AUTO: Michael Barry is out of the office (returning 12/09/2011)

2011-09-01 Thread Michael Barry
I am out of the office until 12/09/2011. Note: This is an automated response to your message "Linuxppc-dev Digest, Vol 85, Issue 4" sent on 1/9/2011 19:49:48. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. ___ Linuxppc-d

Re: [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/85xx: Rename PowerPC core nodes to match other e500mc based .dts

2011-09-01 Thread Tabi Timur-B04825
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > The P4080 silicon device tree was using PowerPC,4080 while the other > e500mc based SoCs used PowerPC,e500mc.  Use the core name to be > consistent going forward. Shouldn't we change the nodes for all e500 based device trees in one shot, instead

Re: [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/85xx: Rename PowerPC core nodes to match other e500mc based .dts

2011-09-01 Thread Tabi Timur-B04825
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/01/2011 02:26 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> The P4080 silicon device tree was using PowerPC,4080 while the other >> e500mc based SoCs used PowerPC,e500mc.  Use the core name to be >> consistent going forward. > > Why are we not using the generic

[PATCH] powerpc/5200: enable audio in the defconfig

2011-09-01 Thread Timur Tabi
Audio support for the MPC5200 exists, so enable it by default. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi --- There was a bug in the audio drivers related to the of_platform changes that was never discovered because these drivers were never compiled by default. This patch should make sure that never happens aga

Re: [PATCH v3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip

2011-09-01 Thread Scott Wood
On 09/01/2011 04:41 AM, LiuShuo wrote: > After doing some tests, I found that the elbc controller can read/write > 4k with one command > if we insert a FIR_OP_NOP between first half reading/wring and second > half reading/writing.(delay for something ?) >From the docs: > A NOP instruction that ap

Re: [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/85xx: Rename PowerPC core nodes to match other e500mc based .dts

2011-09-01 Thread Scott Wood
On 09/01/2011 02:26 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > The P4080 silicon device tree was using PowerPC,4080 while the other > e500mc based SoCs used PowerPC,e500mc. Use the core name to be > consistent going forward. Why are we not using the generic names recommendation? Is the "PowerPC" vendor string stil

Re: VFIO v2 design plan

2011-09-01 Thread Alex Williamson
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 14:10 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:51:38AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 17:48 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:24:43PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 13:04 +1000, Davi

[PATCH 2/4] powerpc/85xx: Rename p2040_rdb.c to p2041_rdb.c

2011-09-01 Thread Kumar Gala
From: Mingkai Hu There's only p2041rdb board for official release, but the p2041 silicon on the board can be converted to p2040 silicon without XAUI and L2 cache function, then the board becomes p2040rdb board. so we use the file name p2041_rdb.c to handle P2040RDB board and P2041RDB board which

[PATCH 4/4] powerpc/85xx: Adding DCSR node to dtsi device trees

2011-09-01 Thread Kumar Gala
From: Stephen George Adding new device tree binding file for the DCSR node. Modifying device tree dtsi files to add DCSR node for P2041, P3041, P3060, P4080, & P5020. Signed-off-by: Stephen George Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2041rdb.dts |4 ++ arch/powerpc/boot/d

[PATCH 3/4] powerpc/p3060qds: Add support for P3060QDS board

2011-09-01 Thread Kumar Gala
From: Shengzhou Liu The P3060QDS is a Freescale reference board that hosts the six-core P3060 SOC. The P3060 Processor combines six e500mc Power Architecture processor cores with high-performance datapath acceleration architecture(DPAA), CoreNet fabric infrastructure, as well as network and perip

[PATCH 2/4] powerpc/85xx: Rename p2040_rdb.c to p2041_rdb.c

2011-09-01 Thread Kumar Gala
From: Mingkai Hu There's only p2041rdb board for official release, but the p2041 silicon on the board can be converted to p2040 silicon without XAUI and L2 cache function, then the board becomes p2040rdb board. so we use the file name p2041_rdb.c to handle P2040RDB board and P2041RDB board which

[PATCH 1/4] powerpc/85xx: Rename PowerPC core nodes to match other e500mc based .dts

2011-09-01 Thread Kumar Gala
The P4080 silicon device tree was using PowerPC,4080 while the other e500mc based SoCs used PowerPC,e500mc. Use the core name to be consistent going forward. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p4080si.dtsi | 16 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/time: When starting the decrementer don't zero the other bits in TCR

2011-09-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 1, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Tudor Laurentiu wrote: > On 9/1/2011 4:56 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:31 AM, Tudor Laurentiu wrote: >> >>> On 9/1/2011 9:27 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Aug 25, 2011, at 7:19 AM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: > Clearing the other TCR b

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/time: When starting the decrementer don't zero the other bits in TCR

2011-09-01 Thread Tudor Laurentiu
On 9/1/2011 4:56 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:31 AM, Tudor Laurentiu wrote: On 9/1/2011 9:27 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Aug 25, 2011, at 7:19 AM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: Clearing the other TCR bits might break code that sets them (e.g. to setup the watchdog or fixed interval tim

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/time: When starting the decrementer don't zero the other bits in TCR

2011-09-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:31 AM, Tudor Laurentiu wrote: > On 9/1/2011 9:27 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> On Aug 25, 2011, at 7:19 AM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: >> >>> Clearing the other TCR bits might break code that sets them (e.g. to setup >>> the watchdog or fixed interval timer) before start_cpu_decr

RE: [PATCH] fsl-rio: Release rapidio port I/O region resource if portfailed to initialize

2011-09-01 Thread Bounine, Alexandre
On Thursday, September 01, 2011 5:52 AM Liu Gang wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] fsl-rio: Release rapidio port I/O region resource if > portfailed to initialize > ... > > Signed-off-by: Liu Gang > --- > arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c |1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >

[PATCH] fsl-rio: Release rapidio port I/O region resource if port failed to initialize

2011-09-01 Thread Liu Gang
The "struct rio_mport" contains a member of master port I/O memory resource structure "struct resource iores". This resource will be read from device tree and be used for rapidio R/W transaction memory space. Rapidio requests the port I/O memory resource under the root resource "iomem_resource".

Re: [PATCH v3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip

2011-09-01 Thread LiuShuo
于 2011年08月25日 19:25, Matthieu CASTET 写道: Hi, LiuShuo a écrit : 于 2011年08月23日 18:02, Matthieu CASTET 写道: LiuShuo a écrit : 于 2011年08月19日 00:25, Scott Wood 写道: On 08/17/2011 09:33 PM, b35...@freescale.com wrote: From: Liu Shuo Freescale FCM controller has a 2K size limitation of buffer RAM.

Re: [PATCH 3/7] serial/8250: move UPIO_TSI to powerpc

2011-09-01 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 01 September 2011 16:02:06 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 23:45 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > This iotype is only used by the legacy_serial code in powerpc, so the > > code should live there, rather than be compiled in for every 8250 > > driver. > > Obviously u

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/time: When starting the decrementer don't zero the other bits in TCR

2011-09-01 Thread Tudor Laurentiu
On 9/1/2011 9:27 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Aug 25, 2011, at 7:19 AM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: Clearing the other TCR bits might break code that sets them (e.g. to setup the watchdog or fixed interval timer) before start_cpu_decrementer() gets called. Can you be more specific about the case you'