On 09/01/2011 02:26 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > The P4080 silicon device tree was using PowerPC,4080 while the other > e500mc based SoCs used PowerPC,e500mc. Use the core name to be > consistent going forward.
Why are we not using the generic names recommendation? Is the "PowerPC" vendor string still appropriate here, or should we use "fsl"? -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
